BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Aggressive fertility treatments are not responsible for the

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Jun 08, 2018 5:01 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Aggressive fertility treatments are not responsible for the rise in the incidence of twin births. Rather, this increase can be attributed to the fact that women are waiting longer to become mothers. Statistically, women over 35 are more likely to conceive twins, and these women now comprise a greater percentage of women giving birth than ever before.

The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that

a. many women over 35 who give birth to twins are not first-time mothers
b. women over 35 are not the only women who give birth to twins
c. the correlation between fertility treatments and the increased incidence of multiple births may be a coincidence
d. on average, women over 35 are no more likely to conceive identical twins than other women are
e. women over 35 are more likely to resort to the sorts of fertility treatments that tend to yield twin births.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Wed Jun 13, 2018 10:35 am
This is a very dicey situation in that the options here are all looking like they all are correct except we need to critique it very well.

From Option A - CORRECT. This is actually very correct and appropriate enough for anyone to know. It is speculative to link women giving birth over 35 years of age, to them being first timers. It'd be unfair statistically and scientifically.

In Option B - INCORRECT. This is very correct. It is not stated in the article passage nor is it inferred that the only women of such age brackets give birth to twins.

In Option C - INCORRECT. I would have said the same thing if i am asked personally in view of the first line statement. Since there is no empirical evidence then it remains a myth and somewhat a coincidence.

In Option D - INCORRECT. Since the adverb ''likely'' has been used then i'd look no further because the word is an assumption that something may/may not happen.

In Option E - INCORRECT. Since the average women may want to believe in this myth then this option may be right but when we need to look at the question again
which states that we search for the odd one out.
Join the discussion