BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Aggravated Assault

Expert replies
by LeoBen » Sat Dec 31, 2011 8:58 am
Since 1991, the percent of men arrested for aggravated assault decreases to 9.5 percent while the amount of women arrested for the same crime increases by 46 percent.

a. the percent of men arrested for aggravated assault decreases to 9.5 percent while the amount of women arrested for the same crime increases by 46 percent.

b. the percent of men arrested for aggravated assault decreases by 9.5 percent while the percent of women arrested for the same crime increases by 46 percent.

c. number of men arrested for aggravated assault decreased by 9.5 percent while the number of women arrested for the same crime increased by 46 percent.

d. number of men arrested for aggravated assault decreased to 9.5 percent as compared to the number of women arrested for the same crime which increased by 46 percent.

e. amount of men arrested for aggravated assault decreased by 9.5 percent while the amount of women arrested for the same crime increased to 46 percent.

OA is C

IMO -- slash off a, b & e for "decreases" and "amount"
Between c & d: c - changes the meaning from "decreased To 9.5%" to "decreased BY 9.5%" & d - the "which" refers to crime instead the no. of X arrested. Under the given case, which option would be better off?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:11 am
LeoBen wrote:Since 1991, the percent of men arrested for aggravated assault decreases to 9.5 percent while the amount of women arrested for the same crime increases by 46 percent.

a. the percent of men arrested for aggravated assault decreases to 9.5 percent while the amount of women arrested for the same crime increases by 46 percent.

b. the percent of men arrested for aggravated assault decreases by 9.5 percent while the percent of women arrested for the same crime increases by 46 percent.

c. number of men arrested for aggravated assault decreased by 9.5 percent while the number of women arrested for the same crime increased by 46 percent.

d. number of men arrested for aggravated assault decreased to 9.5 percent as compared to the number of women arrested for the same crime which increased by 46 percent.

e. amount of men arrested for aggravated assault decreased by 9.5 percent while the amount of women arrested for the same crime increased to 46 percent.

OA is C

IMO -- slash off a, b & e for "decreases" and "amount"
Between c & d: c - changes the meaning from "decreased To 9.5%" to "decreased BY 9.5%" & d - the "which" refers to crime instead the no. of X arrested. Under the given case, which option would be better off?
Since 1991 -- which implies an action that started in the past and might continue in the present -- requires the present perfect tense: Since 1991, the number...HAS DECREASED.
Thus, all of the answer choices can be eliminated.
What is the source of this question?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by LeoBen » Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:31 am
GMATGuruNY wrote: Since 1991 -- which implies an action that started in the past and might continue in the present -- requires the present perfect tense: Since 1991, the number...HAS DECREASED.
Thus, all of the answer choices can be eliminated.
What is the source of this question?
Source is Kaplan Quiz. The rationale for c over d is d being wordy. But if such a question does come is it better to chose c or d?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:50 am
LeoBen wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote: Since 1991 -- which implies an action that started in the past and might continue in the present -- requires the present perfect tense: Since 1991, the number...HAS DECREASED.
Thus, all of the answer choices can be eliminated.
What is the source of this question?
Source is Kaplan Quiz. The rationale for c over d is d being wordy. But if such a question does come is it better to chose c or d?
There are better reasons to eliminate D (aside from the tense error discussed in my post above):
A NUMBER cannot decrease to a PERCENT.
Which seems to refer to crime, but a CRIME cannot increase by 46 percent.
As compared to is unidiomatic.

That being said, if you're debating between two answer choices, and you can't spot an error in either answer choice, choose the one that is more concise.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by LeoBen » Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:05 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
LeoBen wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote: Since 1991 -- which implies an action that started in the past and might continue in the present -- requires the present perfect tense: Since 1991, the number...HAS DECREASED.
Thus, all of the answer choices can be eliminated.
What is the source of this question?
Source is Kaplan Quiz. The rationale for c over d is d being wordy. But if such a question does come is it better to chose c or d?
There are better reasons to eliminate D (aside from the tense error discussed in my post above):
A NUMBER cannot decrease to a PERCENT.
Which seems to refer to crime, but a CRIME cannot increase by 46 percent.
As compared to is unidiomatic.

That being said, if you're debating between two answer choices, and you can't spot an error in either answer choice, choose the one that is more concise.
Thank you. So concision is prefered over meaning. I agree with the issues in D, my doubt was over C changing the meaning from TO to BY, that's all.
Join the discussion

by happymanocha » Sat Dec 31, 2011 11:37 am
This sentence involves comparison. Is it parallel to use decreased to/increased by?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1