BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Age calculation

Expert replies
by shashank.ism » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:13 am
Queen Rudalfina died 181 years after Queen Nadali was born. Their combined
age when they died was 72 years. Queen Nadali died in 315 A.D. In what
year was Queen Rudalfina born?

a.) 349 A.D.
b.) 496 A.D.
c.) 387 A.D.
d.) 424 A.D.
e.) None of these.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by zudecj » Fri Feb 05, 2010 10:29 am
Queen Rudalfina died 181 years after Queen Nadali was born. Their combined
age when they died was 72 years. Queen Nadali died in 315 A.D. In what
year was Queen Rudalfina born?

Answer D)

Rudalfina(death)= nadali(birth)+ 181
Rudalfina(death)+nadali(death)=72

hence, substituting -

72-nadali(death) =nadali(birth) +181

nadali(birth)-nadali(death) =181-72=109 (Nadali lived for 109 years)

Hence if nadali was died in 315 AD ( Remember you need to add instead of subtract since its AD)

315+109 = 424 AD.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:29 am
shashank.ism wrote:Queen Rudalfina died 181 years after Queen Nadali was born. Their combined
age when they died was 72 years. Queen Nadali died in 315 A.D. In what
year was Queen Rudalfina born?

a.) 349 A.D.
b.) 496 A.D.
c.) 387 A.D.
d.) 424 A.D.
e.) None of these.
Combined age when they died - I do not understand
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by zudecj » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:42 am
Combined age when they died - I do not understand
That just tells us the sum of their ages when they died.

for an absurd example : Rudalfina (70 years old when dead) +nadali( 2 years old when dead) =72

That statement was represented in algebra in the following form :
Rudalfina(death)+nadali(death)=72
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:47 am
zudecj wrote:
nadali(birth)-nadali(death) =181-72=109 (Nadali lived for 109 years)
The first quote is from the solution you provided it shows Nadali lived for 109 years

Rudalfina (70 years old when dead) +nadali( 2 years old when dead) =72

now, was Nadali 2 years when she died? or did she live for 109 long years?
zudecj wrote: That just tells us the sum of their ages when they died.

for an absurd example : Rudalfina (70 years old when dead) +nadali( 2 years old when dead) =72

That statement was represented in algebra in the following form :
Rudalfina(death)+nadali(death)=72
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by harsh.champ » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:05 pm
ajith wrote:
zudecj wrote:
nadali(birth)-nadali(death) =181-72=109 (Nadali lived for 109 years)
The first quote is from the solution you provided it shows Nadali lived for 109 years

Rudalfina (70 years old when dead) +nadali( 2 years old when dead) =72

now, was Nadali 2 years when she died? or did she live for 109 long years?
zudecj wrote: That just tells us the sum of their ages when they died.

for an absurd example : Rudalfina (70 years old when dead) +nadali( 2 years old when dead) =72

That statement was represented in algebra in the following form :
Rudalfina(death)+nadali(death)=72
_______________________
I do agree with ajith.Initially,I thought that the meaning of "combined age" is the total no. of years that they lived together.
But couldn't get to forming any equations.
The phrasing of the question is quite confusing.
Hey zudecj,
I see that you have solved the question.Can you rephrase the question in a manner that we can easily understand??

Help would be really appreciated!!
Join the discussion

by zudecj » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:11 pm
Rudalfina (70 years old when dead) +nadali( 2 years old when dead) =72
AS mentioned, this was just an "absurb" example to make the understanding clear, but i do now realize that their combined age coudnt have been 72 if the answer were D.

And hence the answer is not D.

Apologies for the confusion.
Join the discussion