BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Advertisements....

Expert replies
by jitendra_mulchandani » Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:49 am
Advertisement : Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.

Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved, but Jane's will not.
(B) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane's.
(C) Evelyn's headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane's.
(D) Jane's headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn's.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sumitrajsaxena » Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:55 am
It should be B.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:16 am
jitendra_mulchandani wrote:Advertisement : Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.

Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved, but Jane's will not.
(B) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane's.
(C) Evelyn's headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane's.
(D) Jane's headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn's.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.
It should be B.
We can find similarity in the premise wording with the wording present in the answer B.
Only B and C can be counted as contenders. C, however, uses as quickly as which is rather soft statement. But premise uses very strong wording no headache pill that goes inline with option B
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:33 pm
If no pill provides faster relief, there exists the possibility that other pills could match it in terms of speed, and the leading competitor could be one of these pills. One cannot conclude that B is true, but C is a logical statement
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:19 pm
jitendra_mulchandani wrote:Advertisement : Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.

Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved, but Jane's will not.
(B) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane's.
(C) Evelyn's headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane's.
(D) Jane's headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn's.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.
I would still bet for B. For I know that statement no headache pill stops pain more quickly[than Danaxil]. is presented as a direct comparison with the Danaxil pill.

OA pls ? and possibly OE also..:)
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:15 am
That no pill acts more quickly does not mean that no pill acts as quickly
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by jitendra_mulchandani » Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:28 am
OA is C.

The argument states a special condition when Danaxil will be more effective than it's competitors:
when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you

The argument states that Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache, it does not specify that Evelyn is suffering from pain as well.

hence C.
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:58 am
jitendra_mulchandani wrote:OA is C.

The argument states a special condition when Danaxil will be more effective than it's competitors:
when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you

The argument states that Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache, it does not specify that Evelyn is suffering from pain as well.

hence C.
Is there such a thing as a painless headache?
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:14 am
time taken by Danaxil = X
time taken by other pill = Y

"no headache pill stops pain more quickly than Danaxil."
X <= Y.==>i.e, time taken by Danaxil will be less than or equal to time taken by some other pills.

In other words, "Evelyn's headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane's".
C should be OA.
jitendra_mulchandani wrote:Advertisement : Like Danaxil, all headache pills can stop your headache. But when you are in pain, you want relief right away. Danaxil is for you-no headache pill stops pain more quickly.
Evelyn and Jane are each suffering from a headache. Suppose Evelyn takes Danaxil and Jane takes its leading competitor.

Which one of the following can be properly concluded from the claims in the advertisement?
(A) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved, but Jane's will not.
(B) Evelyn's headache pain will be relieved more quickly than Jane's.
(C) Evelyn's headache will be relieved at least as quickly as Jane's.
(D) Jane's headache pain will be relieved at the same time as is Evelyn's.
(E) Jane will be taking Danaxil for relief from headache pain.
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:50 am
Great qn and fantastic explanation.
Join the discussion