Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

adverb 'in 1999'

Expert replies
by gocoder » Fri May 13, 2016 11:35 pm
The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquattina Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell
(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell
(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

I was stuck between B and C.
I am able to eliminate B because of the ambiguous pronoun:'that they will sell'
Can I know how B/C can be distinguished based on the phrase 'in 1999'
Last edited by gocoder on Sat May 14, 2016 3:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Sat May 14, 2016 2:44 am
gocoder wrote: Can I know how B/C can be distinguished based on the phrase 'in 1999'
which + SINGULAR verb must serve to refer to the NEAREST PRECEDING SINGULAR NOUN.

B: The passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages
Here, which allows (which + singular verb) seems to refer to 1999 (the nearest preceding singular noun), implying that 1999 allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate B.

OA: The passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages
Here, which allows (which + singular verb) correctly refers to the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (the nearest preceding singular noun), conveying that the ACT allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages.
This meaning is sensical.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by gocoder » Sat May 14, 2016 3:17 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
gocoder wrote: Can I know how B/C can be distinguished based on the phrase 'in 1999'
which + SINGULAR verb must serve to refer to the NEAREST PRECEDING SINGULAR NOUN.

B: The passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages
Here, which allows (which + singular verb) seems to refer to 1999 (the nearest preceding singular noun), implying that 1999 allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate B.
Thank you Guru.
From the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which , Is it not possible that 'which'modifies the near noun phrase 'Act ' since modifying nearest noun '1999' does not make sense ?

I am bit confused between cases when 'which'modifies nearest noun and when 'which'modifies near noun phrase.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat May 14, 2016 8:30 am
gocoder wrote:I am bit confused between cases when 'which'modifies nearest noun and when 'which'modifies near noun phrase.
Check my second post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sales-up-to- ... 38192.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion