BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Admissions from second tier firms?

Launched April 26, 2006
Expert replies
by pissantvache » Tue May 27, 2008 11:36 am
Hi Lisa,

I was wondering what schools thought of applicants from second-tier MC firms who nevertheless have high stats. I have a 3.8 GPA and a 770 GMAT, which seems like it would normally make me extremely competitive in admissions, except that I will be applying from an Accenture/Deloitte level firm (in the business strategy/operations practice). Since the management consulting pool of applicants is enormously competitive and I'm not at a marquee firm (McK/BCG/Bain), how much do my chances at Harvard, Wharton, and Stanford suffer? My firm is kind of the best that you can get in MC out of my undergrad which is of course gratifying for me, but it seems that due to my uninspiring undergrad institution and mediocre firm, i'll still be at a disadvantage vis-a-vis my competition.

Secondly, how exactly do you recommend that I deal with this in my essays? Complaining about immaturity in high school leading to a poor college and bad job prospects seems whiny, especially because i'm not in a bad position, per se, but just an uncompetitive one.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
They say the sea is cold,
but the sea contains the hottest blood of all,
and the wildest, the most urgent.
Join the discussion
Source: — Ask Stacy Blackman |

by Lisa Anderson » Wed May 28, 2008 4:58 am
Dear pissantvache,

I actually think your perspective on this is completely wrong. There is nothing in the brief profile given that puts you at a disadvantage. Work experience in terms of industry and firm is not an issue; it is what you did in your work experience that matters. It is important to highlight your contribution and accomplishments, demonstrate your advancement, and give concrete examples. If you have been in the same job with no increase in responsibilities for 4 years, you will not be as competitive as a candidate with demonstrable increases in responsibility (i.e., promotions, supervising others, budget growth, etc.) for 4 years.

To be competitive, you want to speak confidently and positively about your work experience. Use your essays, resume and interview to communicate the positive impact you have had and your advancement in the firm. Lastly, leverage your experience as the foundation for your move to your post-MBA career.

Good luck,
Lisa
Lisa Anderson
Consultant
Stacy Blackman Consulting

Learn more about me
Join the discussion