BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ad agency

Expert replies
by maihuna » Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:55 am
If the ad agency that created the television ad for Tough-As-Nails Tools had thoroughly researched customer demographics, then they would have realized that the majority of frequent tool users are men. Yet the ad was shown during a cooking program targeted to women. However, if the advertisers had not researched customer demographics, then the ad would not have incorporated images depicting the use of tools in home improvement projects as an activity that men enjoy. Yet the ad did so. Therefore the ad agency made some sort of mistake: either the agency did not understand the demographics of the cooking program’s audience or the ad was intended to be shown during a different program.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?


The purchasers of products given as gifts are not the ultimate users of those products.

Many women, including those who watch cooking programs, occasionally use tools for home improvement projects.

The ad agency had never previously aired an ad during a program other than the one intended.

Some men, including some who use tools frequently, occasionally watch cooking programs.

The ad agency has a reputation for conducting high quality demographic research.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vivek.kapoor83 » Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:21 am
not sure though but D i think
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:54 am
D is not entirely incorrect given the options, but there are definetly bettr answers
Join the discussion

by chetanojha » Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:14 pm
E). The ad agency has a reputation for conducting high quality demographic research. This seems to be a good contestant as it states that ad agency has a reputation of good demographic research. Which means ad agency has done the research for the ad and placed it during appropriate program knowing that it is a cooking program.
Join the discussion

by canada_sms » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:08 pm
I think it's answer A. It weakens the argument "the ad agency made some sort of mistake" by pointing out the fact that the tool could be given by a female to a male as a gift. The demographic of who buys the product does not have to coincide with the demographic of who uses the product.

I don't think E weakens the argument enough. Just because the ad agency has a reputation for doing good demographic research doesn't necessarily mean that they didn't make a mistake in this case.
Join the discussion

by pandeyvineet24 » Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:28 pm
I think B and D use the words occasionally, there by limiting the scope.

I will go with A. Since the ad could be more targetted at purchasers than the users of the product.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:37 pm
pandeyvineet24 wrote:I think B and D use the words occasionally, there by limiting the scope.

I will go with A. Since the ad could be more targetted at purchasers than the users of the product.
Agreed. It is like baby food ADs.

Parents buy it, kids eat it:)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:40 pm
Yes A is OA.
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:44 pm
Conclusion: either the agency did not understand the demographics of the cooking program’s audience

to weaken it we need to prove that:

ad agency knew the demographics of cooking program audience..... or something related:
Some men, including some who use tools frequently, occasionally watch cooking programs.

this option makes sense
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

Re: Ad agency

by ronniecoleman » Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:46 pm
maihuna wrote:If the ad agency that created the television ad for Tough-As-Nails Tools had thoroughly researched customer demographics, then they would have realized that the majority of frequent tool users are men. Yet the ad was shown during a cooking program targeted to women. However, if the advertisers had not researched customer demographics, then the ad would not have incorporated images depicting the use of tools in home improvement projects as an activity that men enjoy. Yet the ad did so. Therefore the ad agency made some sort of mistake: either the agency did not understand the demographics of the cooking program’s audience or the ad was intended to be shown during a different program.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?


The purchasers of products given as gifts are not the ultimate users of those products.

Many women, including those who watch cooking programs, occasionally use tools for home improvement projects.

The ad agency had never previously aired an ad during a program other than the one intended.

Some men, including some who use tools frequently, occasionally watch cooking programs.

The ad agency has a reputation for conducting high quality demographic research.


there has to be some premises that says that this product is frequently gifted....
now way A

source ???
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

Re: Ad agency

by gsubra » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:55 pm
Princeton review online comparison, test 2...answer below...I had boiled it down to A or B but selected B instead...

The conclusion is that the ad agency made a mistake, based on the premise that it aired an ad apparently aimed at men during a show with a female audience. The assumption is that the ad was intended to be seen by the user of the tools. This answer weakens the argument by showing that the ad could have been intended to be seen by women, who might buy tools as gifts for men. The correct answer is A.



there has to be some premises that says that this product is frequently gifted....
now way A

source ???[/quote]
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:56 am
logitech wrote:
pandeyvineet24 wrote:I think B and D use the words occasionally, there by limiting the scope.

I will go with A. Since the ad could be more targetted at purchasers than the users of the product.
Agreed. It is like baby food ADs.

Parents buy it, kids eat it:)
Good comparison. Agree.
Also:
Some men, including some who use tools frequently, occasionally watch cooking programs.
Very small group of customers. Does not weaken the argument.
Join the discussion

by techwiz » Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:23 pm
A for me.
Sucess is near, keep working!

https://www.techwizclub.info/
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Fri May 13, 2016 2:33 pm
I will go with D
Join the discussion