BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Action Packed Gaming Company

Expert replies
by himu » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:13 pm
The Action-Packed Gaming Company, based on the success of the previous season's video game featuring the character Sam Li, of the popular Fist of Awe series of martial arts movies, developed for the current season a similar martial arts game featuring a new character who is also a martial arts master. The new game had improved 3-D graphics, enhanced multiplayer capability, and dozens of new martial arts moves developed by real-life masters. However, marketing surveys showed that teenagers were uninterested in this new game, and the game sold very poorly.

The passage implies that an explanation for the failure of the new game is based on doubt regarding which of the following assumptions?



Teenagers make purchasing decisions based on the technological merits of video games, not the name recognition of the games' main characters.



Buyers of video games prefer to purchase games based on popular movies.



The Fist of Awe series of movies was extremely popular with teenagers who regularly purchase video games.



Technological improvement from one video game to the next does not guarantee a corresponding increase in sales.



The successful video game may have benefited from advertising associated with the Fist of Awe movies, a benefit the failed video game did not have.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:29 pm
Here's what I said in a previous thread :)
The stimulus is actually about the game that followed Sam Li's game. This new game also had a martial arts master, but we don't know if the new character is from a movie franchise or not.

The question stem is awkward, but I believe it's asking for an assumption in the original argument that would be challenged by an explanation of the game's failure. The explanation is not given, so we are trying to identify something around which we could build our own explanation. To me, the stimulus points out the reasons why the new game should have been successful, but the marketing surveys show that it was not.

Choice A works because technological merits are given as the main benefits of the new game. The company assumes that the advancements are enough to sell the new game because that's what teenagers want. if that's not true, then the failure makes sense.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

Re: Action Packed Gaming Company

by Katzen » Fri Oct 08, 2021 7:27 am
thanks a lot
Join the discussion