BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

According to a study of more than 50,000 Norwegian smokers,

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Aug 12, 2019 8:11 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

According to a study of more than 50,000 Norwegian smokers, smokers who reduced their nicotine intake from cigarettes, even by up to 50 percent, did not achieve significant health benefits. The mortality rate for those who cut back on cigarettes was not lower than that for heavier smokers; moreover, the rate of cardiovascular disease was similar across all subsets of smokers in the study. As a result, the sponsors of the study claim that reducing nicotine intake does not improve one's health.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously jeopardizes the findings of the study described above?

(A) The majority of study participants minimized their nicotine withdrawal symptoms through the use of skin patches and chewing gum that provide nicotine to the body.

(B) Many of the study's participants periodically dined in restaurants in which smoking was permitted.

(C) The study's participants started smoking at different ages and had varied initial nicotine intake.

(D) Quitting smoking entirely results in a marked reduction in the ill effects of smoking.

(E) Men and women who smoked pipes and cigars were excluded from the study.

OA A

Source: Manhattan Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Fri Aug 16, 2019 1:43 pm
We need to find what calls the finding of the study to question.
Premise: The mortality rate for those who cut back in cigarettes is not lower than that for heavy smokers.
Conclusion: Reducing nicotine intake does not improve one's health.

OPTION A - CORRECT
If true, it means that the finding of the study is wrong. The study participants did not reduce their nicotine intake due to the use of skin patches and chewing gum, and this jeopardizes the conclusion to the argument.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
If true, it does not explain how dining in such restaurants jeopardizes the findings of the argument.

OPTION C - INCORRECT
It doesn't explain how reducing nicotine intake does not improve one's health.

OPTION D - INCORRECT
The argument is more concerned with the reduction of nicotine intake from smoking cigarettes and no entirely quitting it.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
There is no indication or evidence to back up this claim in the argument.
Join the discussion