Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

accidents

Expert replies
by vivek.kapoor83 » Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:04 am
20. In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.

(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.



I am looking for explanations as well.. OA after discussion.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatmachoman » Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:56 am
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:19 pm
IMO:

(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States. - weakens the argument by pointing out that europeans are more likely to wear seat belts.

(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers. - clearly weakens the argument

(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market. - european cars are more rugged

(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe. - is the answer
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents. - proves that having a safety belt does not reduces the severity of injury
Join the discussion

by dare2dream » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:33 pm
IMO D.
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:52 am
Can anyone elaborate on D please. Isnt it actually weakening the argument by saying that it is not about the safety belt but the way the cars are built. This implies that adopting stringent standards for safety belt design is not going to help with protecting passengers
Join the discussion

by mp2437 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:59 am
delhiboy1979 wrote:Can anyone elaborate on D please. Isnt it actually weakening the argument by saying that it is not about the safety belt but the way the cars are built. This implies that adopting stringent standards for safety belt design is not going to help with protecting passengers
You are confusing with choice C.
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:58 am
how D is realted to the design of seat belts...
As conclusion says...US needs to be more strident on making seat belts and modify design
so we should look something that can strength the conclusion
how number is related to seat belt design ?
Join the discussion