BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute value question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Absolute value question

by logitech » Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:35 pm
lightbulb wrote:Guys, this is from the GmatPrep:

If zy < xy < 0, is |x - z| + |x| = |z|

(1) z < x

(2) y > 0

Answer: D

Could someone please explain the answer?

Thank you.

zy < xy < 0

means that zy and xy have both two numbers with different signs. ( +-) or (-+)

and you will see that they both have "y" in common

SO:

A ) If Y>0 (X and Z) < 0 and X > Z so that we can have zy < xy < 0

B ) if Y<0 (X and Z) > 0 and X < Z so that we can have zy < xy < 0

Lets go back to statements:

1 ) z < x

This means that x - z > 0 so it can get out the absolute value sign as it is

and we also know that if x > Z they have to be both NEGATIVE NUMBERS ( look at A )

so:


IS |x - z| + |x| = |z| ?

X-Z + ( -X ) = -Z

which is |z|, since Z is negative it needs to be -Z

Sufficient :D

(2) y > 0

We already discussed this

A ) If Y>0 (X and Z) < 0 and X > Z so that we can have zy < xy < 0

Sufficient :D

Hence, it is D
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by lightbulb » Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:23 pm
Thanks. I used your response to solve the problem as follows:

Given:

If zy < xy < 0, is |x - z| + |x| = |z|

We can have two possibilities:

(I) y > 0. This implies
- z and x are both negative
- z is more negative than x (z < x)

(II) y < 0. This implies
- z and x are both positive
- z > x

So here we go:

(A) z < x
Now, either y > 0 or y < 0.
If y < 0, then both z and x are +ve, but, then z cannot be less than x because zy < xy < 0.

This implies: y > 0. Which further impiles z and x are both negative.

Plug z = -3, x = -2
|-2 - (-3)| + (-2) = (-3)
1 - 2 = -3
-1 = -3
The above statement is not true.
Therefore, under the given conditions, the algebraic expression is false - for sure.
So (A) is sufficient.

(B) y > 0
This impiles z and x are both negative and the problem reduces to (A).
So, (B) is also sufficient.
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Mon May 25, 2009 9:38 am
is |x - z| + |x| = |z|
distance between x and z + distance between 0 and x = distance between z and 0

This means, on a number line : 0................x..........z
we are also given zy < xy < 0

Statement 1 : z < x

If x>z, then automatically the answer to this Question is No.
we arrive at a conclusion using this statement that is |x - z| + |x| = |z| is not correct

Statement 2 : y > 0
this is same as statement (1)
ie : z < x

Thus is |x - z| + |x| = |z| is incorrect

With both the statements we are able to arrive at the same conclusion that is |x - z| + |x| = |z| is incorrect

So answer has to be D

Please correct me if I am wrong

Regards
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon May 25, 2009 8:16 pm
Karan - I think you didn't consider the possibility that z and x are both negative here; the number line could look like this:

----z------x----------0------y--------


This is an odd question, since you can solve it without using either of the statements. I explained further in this thread:

www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-math-zy-x ... t5848.html
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion