BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute Value (lost in a)

Expert replies
by El Cucu » Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:19 pm
1. Is 0<x<1?

a) 1/x > [x]

b) [x]<1

OA is A

a) I don't know how to think this. At first I try to solve like this:
1/x>x so x could be -2 or - (1/x)<x so x could be 1/2, 1 or 2.

b) this clearly means that x is between -1 and 1 so insufficient

Tksvm
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by vittalgmat » Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:49 am
1. Is 0<x<1?

a) 1/x > [x]

b) [x]<1

Stmt 1:
1/x > |x|
ie 1/x - |x| > 0

The LHS (left hand side) can be >0 ONLY if x is a +ve fraction
U can try the following smart numbers to prove the above.
-2, -1/2, 0, 1/2, 1, 2

So sufficient.


stmt 2:
|x| < 1

|x| is always >= 0.

So here |x| < 1.

But -1 < x < 1 so it is insufficient.

Hence A.

Ht Helps
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:55 am
Ian,
can you please help it solve algebrically?
Join the discussion

by rossmj » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:14 am
1. Is 0<x<1?

a) 1/x > [x]

-1/x<x<1/x

by looking at this you should be able to determine two things
1) x is positive becuse if x were negative -1/-#<-# would be violated because the two negatives make a positive.
2) x must be <1 because an integer such as 2 would yield 2<1/2 which wouldn't make sense but 1/2<2 does make sense.

These two things make A sufficient


b) [x]<1

-1<x<1

This alone is not sufficent
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:16 pm
now 1/x > |x|

Part 1 :- since |x| is always +ve and 1/x is greater than tht +ve value, 1/x shud definitely be +ve.

Part 2 :- From statement 1 we also get 1>x*|x|.

So x>0 since x is +ve and less than 1 since x*|x|<1

Hence A
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:43 pm
First of All, let me make it clear:

[x] and |x| are different

[x] means greatest integer function, this function rounds off the number to nearest smallest integer value.

eg : [8.3] = 8
and [-9.2] =-10


|x| = gives a positive value,no matter x is negative or positive

so |-4| = 4
and |-4.5| = 4.5
a) 1/x > [x]
In the original question
we use greatest integer function

Everyone has misinterpreted the [x] as |x|

(I) this statement means
0< x < 1

because if we take x = 0.5

1/0.5 = 2

and [x] = [0.5] =0

so 1/x > [x]

And if we take -1<x< 0

because x has to be negative fraction lets say: -0.5

1/-0.5 = -2

and [-0.5] = -1

so 1/x not greater than [x]

rest other options where x>1 or x<-1 also cannot satisfy this inequation

So A is Suff

I looks big but it is very easy.


Although one can get an answer correct but I believe it is much more important to learn the correct method, that is what learning is.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/is-x-y-t10389.html#141440

Hope this Helps

Karan
Join the discussion

by Sher1 » Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:07 pm
I never saw any q before testing []. Are we sure the original post did not have a typo?
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:43 pm
Oops
I have never seen that notation [] before. I suppose the question should have a explanation of []. Since this was absent, I assumed it to be | |.
Join the discussion

by piyush_nitt » Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:04 am
gmat740 wrote:First of All, let me make it clear:

[x] and |x| are different

[x] means greatest integer function, this function rounds off the number to nearest smallest integer value.

eg : [8.3] = 8
and [-9.2] =-10


|x| = gives a positive value,no matter x is negative or positive

so |-4| = 4
and |-4.5| = 4.5
a) 1/x > [x]
In the original question
we use greatest integer function

Everyone has misinterpreted the [x] as |x|

(I) this statement means
0< x < 1

because if we take x = 0.5

1/0.5 = 2

and [x] = [0.5] =0

so 1/x > [x]

And if we take -1<x< 0

because x has to be negative fraction lets say: -0.5

1/-0.5 = -2

and [-0.5] = -1

so 1/x not greater than [x]

rest other options where x>1 or x<-1 also cannot satisfy this inequation

So A is Suff

I looks big but it is very easy.


Although one can get an answer correct but I believe it is much more important to learn the correct method, that is what learning is.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/is-x-y-t10389.html#141440

Hope this Helps

Karan
IMO C

Karan , what if the value of x = 1?
Join the discussion

by gmat740 » Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:01 am
Karan , what if the value of x = 1?
well In that case

[x] = [1] = 1

so 1/x = [x]

inequality changes to equality

Hope this helps

Karan
Join the discussion