Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Absolute Value - Help Please

Expert replies
by siddarth » Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:27 am
Is |x-z|>|x-y|

1) |z|>|y|
2) 0>x

My solution was as follows:

the original equation will give us 2 results:

a) x-z>x-y => x-z-x+y>0 => y+z>0.
b) -x+z>-x+y => -x+z+x-y>0 => z-y>0.

Now Statement 1 will satisfy both these conditions, so my answer is Statement 1 is enough to answer the question.

Statement 2 by itself is of no help.

The Answer however is E.

Could someone please help me out with this. I always get confused with Absolute Value questions.

Should i instead take numbers and work out such problems.

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gdrea3 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:57 am
Start with the easier statement, (2)--> 0>x INSUFFICIENT
Statement 1 states that the absolute value of z is greater than the absolute value of y, but it doesn't tell us about the value of x-->INSUFFICIENT.

Put the two statements together:
so if 0>x, pick a negative number for x
and if the abolute val of z>absolute val of x, pick positive AND negative #s (remember that # is the absolute value brackets are POSITIVE AFTER YOU DO ANY ADDITION, SUBTRACTION, MULTIPLICATION, etc:

Use -1 for x, -3 for z, and -2 for y:
|x-z|>|x-y| -->|-1+3|>|-1+2| so is 2>1? YES

Use -10 for x,-4 for z, and -2 for y:
|x-z|>|x-y| -->|-10+4|>|-10+2| so is 6>8 NO

BOTH statements together are insufficient
Join the discussion

by siddarth » Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:15 am
Thanks, got it
gdrea3 wrote:Start with the easier statement, (2)--> 0>x INSUFFICIENT
Statement 1 states that the absolute value of z is greater than the absolute value of y, but it doesn't tell us about the value of x-->INSUFFICIENT.

Put the two statements together:
so if 0>x, pick a negative number for x
and if the abolute val of z>absolute val of x, pick positive AND negative #s (remember that # is the absolute value brackets are POSITIVE AFTER YOU DO ANY ADDITION, SUBTRACTION, MULTIPLICATION, etc:

Use -1 for x, -3 for z, and -2 for y:
|x-z|>|x-y| -->|-1+3|>|-1+2| so is 2>1? YES

Use -10 for x,-4 for z, and -2 for y:
|x-z|>|x-y| -->|-10+4|>|-10+2| so is 6>8 NO

BOTH statements together are insufficient
Join the discussion