BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Absolute value...again

Expert replies
by Uri » Wed May 06, 2009 7:05 am
Is |x|= y-z?
(1) x + y = z
(2) x < 0

OA: [spoiler](C)[/spoiler] Not sure whether the OA is correct.

My logic:
St 1: x=z-y
Since |x| is always positive, we can modify statement (1) as -x=y-z
Thus, |x|=y-z
St 2: insufficient.
Please check my logic for statement (1).
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Absolute value...again

by bluementor » Wed May 06, 2009 8:00 am
Uri wrote:
My logic:
St 1: x=z-y
Since |x| is always positive, we can modify statement (1) as -x=y-z
Thus, |x|=y-z
St 2: insufficient.
Please check my logic for statement (1).[/color]
You arrived at -x = y - z. You have also noted |x| cannot be negative. This is correct.

However, the mistake you are making is that you are assuming y-z to be positive (or x to be negative). You don't know this, hence you can't conclude anything here. Either you have to know the sign of (y-z), or you have know the sign of x, both of which is not known from this statement.

if x>0, then |x| = z - y
if x<0, then |x| = y - z

Statement 2 gives you the sign of x, so together with statement 1, you can conclude that |x| = y - z. Sufficient.

Choose C.

-BM-
Join the discussion

Re: Absolute value...again

by Musiq » Wed May 06, 2009 11:28 am
Uri wrote:Is |x|= y-z?
(1) x + y = z
(2) x < 0

OA: [spoiler](C)[/spoiler] Not sure whether the OA is correct.

My logic:
St 1: x=z-y
Since |x| is always positive, we can modify statement (1) as -x=y-z
Thus, |x|=y-z
St 2: insufficient.
Please check my logic for statement (1).
Hi Uri, I have seen over the past few days that Absolute value seems to be your bugbear.
Here's a great rule to remember....Absolute Value of anything is >OR = Zero.
Thats the same as saying " Abs. Value is Not NEGATIVE"....but my restatement really helps in solving DS.

Let's restate the question now as:

Is y - z => Zero ?


Attack Statement II first, since it's easier to process:
X is NEGATIVE ........we cannot answer the question with this information

Eliminate B and D

Statement I
Rearrange to make it look like the question:

y - z = -x

Again we dont know what X is in this statement....eliminate A

Combining statements we get, y - z = - ( x)
Or ....................................... y - z = - ( Negative number)
Or ....................................... y - z = A POSITIVE NUMBER ALWAYS

ALWAYS is key, because this answers our DS question as "Always YES".
Therefore Sufficiency is obtained.

C is the correct answer.
For love, not money.
Join the discussion

by Uri » Thu May 07, 2009 4:47 am
nice approach, musiq!
thanks BM for pointing to my fault.
Join the discussion