BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Abs Vaule Question

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by seal4913 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:53 pm
|x + y| > |x| + |y|?

1) x + y < 0
2) xy < 0

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient
Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient
BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient
EACH statement ALONE is sufficient
Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient

I think the answer is B.

If I take x = 0 and y = 1 i get 1 > 1 which is false.
However in statement 2 x and y cannot be 0 therefore one is positive and one is negative. making
x = 1 and y = -2

I get 1 < 3 sufficient. That is true for all vaules as one is always positive and the other negative and one never being zero.

Am I correct?
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by seal4913 » Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:46 am
No input?
Join the discussion

by pootej » Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:30 pm
From the question stem we can conclude that |x| + |y| is always +ve.

1) x+y<0

X = -2 and Y = -3 => X + Y = -5 <0; |X+Y| = 5; and |x| = 2 and |Y| = 3 ==> |X|+|Y| = 5
|X+Y|=|X|+|Y|

X = 2 and Y = -3 => X + Y = -1 <0; |X+Y| = 1; and |X| = 2 and |Y| = 3 ==> |X|+|Y| = 5
|X+Y|<|X|+|Y|

X = -3 and Y = 0 => X + Y = -3 <0; |X+Y| = 3 and |X| = 3 and |Y| = 0 |X| + |Y| = 3
|X+Y| = |X| + |Y|

So with statment one alone we are not getting fixed answer either YES or NO, hence it is not sufficient.

2) XY<0

hence either X or Y is -ve. Please note that both -ve and both +ve condition not possible as its prodcut results into +ve which inturn falls the given statement. Also ) is not possible, as the product XY results into 0 and inturn contradicts the given statement.

X = 2 and Y = -3 => X + Y = -1 => |X+Y| = 1 ; XY = -6 < 0 and |X| = 2 and |Y| = 3 ==> |X|+|Y| = 5 |X+Y|<|X|+|Y| So this concludes that |X+Y| is not greater than |X| + |Y|

X = -2 and Y = 3 => X + Y = 1 => |X+Y| = 1 ; XY = -6 < 0 and |X| = 2 and |Y| = 3 ==> |X|+|Y| = 5
|X+Y|<|X|+|Y| So this concludes that |X+Y| is not greater than |X| + |Y|

X = 5 and Y = -3 => X + Y = 2 => |X+Y| = 2 ; XY = -15 < 0 and |X| = 5 and |Y| = 3 ==> |X|+|Y| = 8
|X+Y|<|X|+|Y| So this concludes that |X+Y| is not greater than |X| + |Y|

Hence from above three examples it is clear that for any set of values of X & Y when either of the value is -ve |X+Y| is always less than |X| + |Y|. This is true for fractions also.

Hence for all combinations we get only one result i.e. NO which is sufficient.

Hence statement 2 alone is sufficient to answer this question. Hence the answer is B.
Join the discussion

by Mr Smith » Fri Apr 06, 2012 8:21 pm
I think @seal4913 you must have got the question wrong.
Because,

always, |x+y| <= |x| + |y| (the 2 sides are equal when both x and y have the same sign and RHS<LHS when x and y have opposite signs)
Hence Is |x+y| > |x| + |y|? is always NO
So in that case your answer should be D

But if your question is
Is |x+y| < |x| + |y|? then B is the answer as explained by pootej
Join the discussion

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:01 pm
Hi, there. I'll add my two cents to this discussion. :)

I completely agree with Mr Smith. The original question, as posted by seal4913, is a faulty DS questions, because the prompt question always has an answer of no, irrespective of the two statements. No legitimate GMAT DS question will have a prompt that is always true or always false and therefore entirely independent of the two statements.

Just to review the math facts

|x| + |y| = |x + y| only when x and y have the same sign --- both positive or both negative (or, either one of them could be zero)

|x| + |y| > |x + y| when x and y have opposite sign.

In the original DS question, if the prompt were |x + y| < |x| + |y|, instead of |x + y| > |x| + |y|, then it would have been a sensible DS question with an answer of B, as Mr Smith has said.

Just for further practice, here's a PS problem with absolute value:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/131
When you submit your answer to that question, the next page will have a video explanation. Each one of 800+ of Magoosh's GMAT questions has its own video explanation.

I hope all that helps. Let me know if anyone has any questions on what I've written.

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion