Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

abs. value

Expert replies
by mariah » Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:15 am
Is [x]< 1?
(1) [x + 1] = 2[x - 1]
(2) [x - 3]&#8800; 0

oa C
imo A
please expl.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DanaJ » Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:31 am
This is equivalent to finding out if -1 < x < 1.
1. Let's split this up into cases:
a. x < -1, then |x + 1|= -x - 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve the equation:
-x - 1 = 2 - 2x
x = 3. This however is not consistent with the initial assumption, of x < -1.

b. x is between -1 and 1. You get that |x + 1| = x + 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve for x:
x + 1 = 2 - 2x
3x = 1, with x = 1/3. This is consistent with -1 < x < 1. So x = 1/3 is a solution of the equation.

c. x > 1 making our equation:
x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3 - consistent with x > 1. So x = 3 is also a solution of the equation.
So 1 has two solutions: 1/3 and 3, which means that 1 is insufficient.

2. is insufficient, since this only tells us that x is not equal to 3.

Take both stmts together and you eliminate one of the solutions of stmt 1, meaning x = 3. Then you are left with x = 1/3, and you can tell that |x| <1.


So C is indeed correct.
Join the discussion

by sureshbala » Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:45 am
DanaJ wrote:This is equivalent to finding out if -1 < x < 1.
1. Let's split this up into cases:
a. x < -1, then |x + 1|= -x - 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve the equation:
-x - 1 = 2 - 2x
x = 3. This however is not consistent with the initial assumption, of x < -1.

b. x is between -1 and 1. You get that |x + 1| = x + 1 and |x - 1| = 1 - x. Solve for x:
x + 1 = 2 - 2x
3x = 1, with x = 1/3. This is consistent with -1 < x < 1. So x = 1/3 is a solution of the equation.

c. x > 1 making our equation:
x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = 3 - consistent with x > 1. So x = 3 is also a solution of the equation.
So 1 has two solutions: 1/3 and 3, which means that 1 is insufficient.

2. is insufficient, since this only tells us that x is not equal to 3.

Take both stmts together and you eliminate one of the solutions of stmt 1, meaning x = 3. Then you are left with x = 1/3, and you can tell that |x| <1.


So C is indeed correct.
Perfect....maria you can't ask for more than this...
Join the discussion