BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ab = 30x is x a non-integer

Expert replies
by abhi332 » Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:24 pm
If a and b are consecutive positive integers, and ab = 30x is x a non-integer?
(1) a^2 is divisible by 21
(2) 35 is a factor of b^2

[spoiler]OA:C
[/spoiler]
What you think, you become.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by hrishi19884 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:20 am
a,b are consecutive integers

so , b= a+1

and ab = a(a+1) = a^2 + a =30x

from 1 : a^2 is div by 21,

Let a=21, so (a^2 + 21 or a) => is always divided by 21

moreover (a^2 + a)/21 =(21^2 + 21)/21 = 22

so we have 22 = 30 x,

i.e x = 22/30 =11/15 = non integer.

1) alone is sufficient

now a = b-1 , so ab = ( b-1)b = b^2 -b

now let b=35. so b^2 is always div by 35 and also by (35^2 -35) or (b^2-b)

so (35^2 -35)/35 = 34

34 = 30 x

x= 30/34 = 15/17 = non integer.

2) alone is also sufficient.


I am getting answer as D: each stem is sufficient to answer the question.

I think I am missing here something. plz help out to why it is C (both stems are required to answer)

Thanks for posting this question abhi :)
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by firdaus117 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:19 am
hrishi19884 wrote:a
I am getting answer as D: each stem is sufficient to answer the question.

I think I am missing here something. plz help out to why it is C (both stems are required to answer)

Thanks for posting this question abhi :)
You forgot that in Data sufficiency,we check whether given data are sufficient enough to reach a conclusion.So,in this question though you have found one value of 'x' suiting the condition,you didn't bothered to check if it is a unique value and if there aren't other values breaching the condition.That's where you have erred in reaching a conclusion.
a^2 is div by 21 means both a and a^2 are divisible by 21(for an integer a).Hence a=21k and a^2=21^2k^2
Eventually,using your steps further
22y=30 x
For y=30 x=22 an integer.....
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:34 am
Yeah, I did bother to find the other values but didn't get those which (a^2 + a) is not div by 21 but a^2 is div by 21

similarly was the case with 35

can you tell me what values they could be?
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:56 am
abhi332 wrote:If a and b are consecutive positive integers, and ab = 30x is x a non-integer?
(1) a^2 is divisible by 21
(2) 35 is a factor of b^2

[spoiler]OA:C
[/spoiler]
This is a bad question. I'll explain why at the bottom of my post, but first:

ab = 30x; is x a non-integer?

Does ab/30 = a (non) integer?

In order for the product ab to be divisible by 30, the product ab has to contain 2, 3, and 5 in its prime factorization. Because they are consecutive, we know exactly one of a and b is even; so, we know ab already has 2 in its prime factorization. The question becomes: does ab have 3 and 5 in its prime factorization?

(1) a^2 is divisible by 21;

In order for a^2/21 to be an integer, a has to have 3 and 7 in its prime factorization. But either of a or b may or may not be a multiple of 5...insufficient.

(2) 35 is a factor of b^2;

therefore, b has 5 and 7 in its prime factorization. But either of a or b may or may not be a multiple of 3...insufficient.

Together, you know that ab is a multiple of 3 and 5. Sufficient in combination.

HOWEVER, this question is flawed in design, as I remarked above. The information in the question stem contradicts the information in the combined statements: The question stem tells us that a and b are consecutive positive integers while the combined statements tell us that both a and b are multiples of 7. But two consecutive integers cannot be multiples of the same positive integer (unless that integer is 1). Without the word "consecutive", the question would be fine.

What is the source of this question?
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by abhi332 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:29 am
[spoiler]Source: Manhattan Challenge question[/spoiler]
What you think, you become.
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:24 am
Testluv wrote:
abhi332 wrote:If a and b are consecutive positive integers, and ab = 30x is x a non-integer?
(1) a^2 is divisible by 21
(2) 35 is a factor of b^2

[spoiler]OA:C
[/spoiler]
This is a bad question. I'll explain why at the bottom of my post, but first:

ab = 30x; is x a non-integer?

Does ab/30 = a (non) integer?

In order for the product ab to be divisible by 30, the product ab has to contain 2, 3, and 5 in its prime factorization. Because they are consecutive, we know exactly one of a and b is even; so, we know ab already has 2 in its prime factorization. The question becomes: does ab have 3 and 5 in its prime factorization?
AMAZING explanation Deepak! Thanks a ton.

I have just one more query.

In the above, you said that ab should contain 2,3,5 in its prime factorization.

So if I consider a = 21 (which has both factors 3 and 7 as per (1))

and if I consider b = 35(which has both factors 5 and 7 as per (2))

so a*b will just be 21*35 and here we haven't accounted "2" anywhere which is needed. Also they a, b aren't consecutive.

So if I take a PRODUCT a*b as 21*35*2 , how we can be so sure that the product contains two consecutive integers(a,b).

and that ab/30 will be a non integer.

It is also possible that a*b is non consecutive(since consecutive a,b do not exists) but it satisfies(1) and (2)

We have no information about what product a*b can be : it can be 21*35*8 as well right?
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:56 am
Hi Hrishi,

ignoring the word "consecutive" in the question stem, and considering the statements in combination would mean that ab has 3, 5 and two 7s in its prime factorization, which is not enough to know whether it is divisible by 30, and the answer would be E.

In data sufficiency, we always have to look at the information in each statement in conjunction with the information in the question stem. Here, the question stem demands that a and b be consecutive positive integers. But, as I explained in my first post, the combined statements make that impossible.

I hope that clears things up. :)
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by hrishi19884 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:36 am
Thanks Deepak! It is an ambiguous question. I don't think this one is tested in GMAT.
Hrishi

"As you sow, so shall you reap"
Join the discussion