BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A table made entirely from the trunk of a tree said to have lived a thousand years was recently claimed to be that of a

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Mar 16, 2020 5:40 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

A table made entirely from the trunk of a tree said to have lived a thousand years was recently claimed to be that of a much younger tree. In order to rebut this charge, the craftsman summoned a team of dendrochronologists to prove that the tree lived to be at least to 1,000 years old. Dendrochronology, or the technique of using tree rings to date wood, is based on the fact that for each passing year a tree develops exactly one ring, as seen in a horizontal cross-section of the trunk. Given that dendrochronology is accurate for trees that lived less than 2,000 total years, the dendrochronologists will be able to determine whether the work comes from a tree that lived to be at least 1,000 years old.

Which of the following is an assumption that the argument makes?


A. The artist has not used the trunk of the same tree in other works of art he has produced.

B. The tree was not less than 1,000 years old when it was cut down.

C. The artist worked on the wood consistently, without taking breaks of more than one year.

D. The wood used in the table is large enough to contain a span of one thousand tree rings.

E. Dendrochronology has shown to be inaccurate for the oldest trees in the world, since parts of the trunks are so worn down that traces of tree rings are difficult to discern.


OA D

Source: Magoosh
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Premise: A table made entirely from the trunk of a tree said to have lived a thousand years was recently claimed to be that of a much younger tree.

Conclusion: In order to rebut this charge, the craftsman summoned a team of dendrochronologists to prove that the tree lived to be at least to 1,000 years old.

So, we want to examine the options to see which can serve as the assumption of this passage.

Option A - Incorrect:
The other works of art produced by the artist are not the subject matter of consideration in this passage. So, this assumption holds no strong point.

Option B - Incorrect:
We cannot be so sure about this assumption because the number of years the tree lived before it was cut down was not stated in the passage. It could have lived less or more than 1000 years before cutting it down, we can't be so sure. However, we can still deduce that the tree has lived more than 1000 years because a table that has lived 1000 years was made from its trunk.

Option C - Incorrect:
This is out of context with respect to the passage.

Option D - Correct:
For each passing year, a tree develops exactly one ring, as seen in a horizontal cross-section of the trunk. In addition to validating the passage conclusion from my point of view assumption, if the table made from the trunk of the tree has lived 1000 years; this means that the tree in question has lived at least 1000 years. So, we can easily assume that the wood used in the table is large enough to contain a span of one thousand tree rings.

Option E - Incorrect:
Of course, the dendrochronology approach is only accurate for trees that lived less than 2000 total years, and this validates this claim ("Dendrochronology has shown to be inaccurate for the oldest trees in the world"). However, this doesn't build an assumption to make the passage conclusion a reality (i.e .... summoned a team of dendrochronologists to prove that the tree lived to be at least to 1,000 years old.).
Join the discussion