BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A study of high blood pressure treatments found that certain

Expert replies
by guerrero » Sun Sep 29, 2013 2:17 pm
A study of high blood pressure treatments found that certain meditation techniques and the most commonly prescribed drugs are equally effective if the selected treatment is followed as directed over the long term. Half the patients given drugs soon stop taking them regularly, whereas eighty percent of the study's participants who were taught meditation techniques were still regularly using them five years later. Therefore, the meditation treatment is the one likely to produce the best results.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. People who have high blood pressure are usually advised by their physicians to make changes in diet that have been found in many cases to reduce the severity of the condition.
B. The participants in the study were selected in part on the basis of their willingness to use meditation techniques.
C. Meditation techniques can reduce the blood pressure of people who do not suffer from high blood pressure.
D. Some of the participants in the study whose high blood pressure was controlled through meditation techniques were physicians.
E. Many people with dangerously high blood pressure are unaware of their condition.


source -GMATPREP . Why A is wrong ?

OA B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Sun Sep 29, 2013 3:59 pm
Hi guerrero,

This CR prompt is based solely on a study that compares two techniques to treat high blood pressure: drugs and meditation.

Conclusion: meditation is likely to produce the best results.

Evidence: in the study, of those who took drugs, half stop taking the drugs; of those who did meditation, 80% still did it 5 years later.

We are asked to weaken the prompt.

Answer A brings up a different approach to lowering blood pressure, but this has no relevance on the argument (that meditation is more likely to produce the best results COMPARED TO drugs). In a different type of question, answer A COULD be a weakener, but not in this one.

We need an answer that would likely state that meditation won't work for everyone the way it worked for people in the study. With THAT nudge, I think that you can spot the correct answer.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by rakeshd347 » Sun Sep 29, 2013 5:49 pm
guerrero wrote:A study of high blood pressure treatments found that certain meditation techniques and the most commonly prescribed drugs are equally effective if the selected treatment is followed as directed over the long term. Half the patients given drugs soon stop taking them regularly, whereas eighty percent of the study's participants who were taught meditation techniques were still regularly using them five years later. Therefore, the meditation treatment is the one likely to produce the best results.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. People who have high blood pressure are usually advised by their physicians to make changes in diet that have been found in many cases to reduce the severity of the condition.
B. The participants in the study were selected in part on the basis of their willingness to use meditation techniques.
C. Meditation techniques can reduce the blood pressure of people who do not suffer from high blood pressure.
D. Some of the participants in the study whose high blood pressure was controlled through meditation techniques were physicians.
E. Many people with dangerously high blood pressure are unaware of their condition.


source -GMATPREP . Why A is wrong ?

OA B
B should be the correct answer clearly out of all.
To answer your question let me elaborate here:
The argument is here that out of two methods (meditation and medicine) meditation is better and it will produce the best results. Now we have to weaken it. We have to show that NO it will not produce the best results or it will NOT produce the best results for everyone. Thats what B says. Only people who chose meditation they like meditation and not everyone is willing to do it ( either they are not able to do it or they don't want to do it).
A on the other hand suggest a new method about the diet. Now who cares here about the diet. Our scope of the passage is only between these two methods bringing another method will not weaken the argument.
For better clarification ask yourself let us say that diet was recommended by physician and that caused better result. But those people who took that diet what were they doing?( they were doing meditation or taking drugs) we don't know that So A doesn't have any affect on the argument.
Join the discussion