BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A study of a math program implemented in several pre-schools

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:47 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

A study of a math program implemented in several pre-schools indicates that children who received the specialized Math Plus math education between the ages three and five had significantly higher math scores in 3rd and 4th grade than their classmates who did not receive this instruction. The proponents of the math argue that the introduction of this program for all children age three to five will significantly improve their chances for success in school.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the above argument?

A) Most parents send their children to preschool for social development and do not have a clear idea about what types of education they want for their children.
B) Cognitive abilities of 3- to 5-year-old children are constantly changing.
C) The children in the pre-schools that were studied had previously been exposed to another math enrichment program.
D) Children are not really interested in enrichment programs in preschool.
E) The cost factor needs to be specified and established before a large scale program can be undertaken.

OA C

Source: Economist GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:39 pm
Consider the explanations given below to answer the tricky question.
The concluding statement was ( Math+ program during 3 - 5 years age is responsible for higher score in 3rd and 4th grade).
We are testing for weaken...The weakener shows (some other factor is responsible for higher score).

Option A:- Incorrect
Most parents send their children to pre- school for social development and do not have a clear idea about what type of education they want to for their children.
This option is irrelevant and it does not in anyway give strength or weakens the argument. The bottom line here is 'math + is responsible for higher grade'.

Option B:- Incorrect
Cognitive abilities of 3- to -5 year old children are constantly changing. YES they might be changing however, how as their exposure to math + responsible for their high grade in 4th and 5th grade? This option says nothing about that.

Option C:- correct
The children in the pre- schools that were studied had previously been exposed to another math enrichment program.
NO! they were not previously exposed to another math enrichment program. However, there ages at the pre-school they underwent math+ which makes them have higher grades.

Option D:- Incorrect
Children are not really interested in enrichment programs in pre-school. This is irrelevant and does not prove a point.

Option E- Incorrect
The cost factor needs to be specified and established before a large scale program can be undertaken.
This is definitely out of scope of discussion and it neither make reference to the math+ class nor the high grades know 4th and 5th grade.
Join the discussion