BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A semi-colon question.

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:44 pm
In the 1980s advertising revenues accounted for approximately 40% of operating profits of a typical local newspaper ; in the 1990s this proportion increased to 57%.


A] newspaper; in the 1990s this proportion increased to 57%.

B] newspaper; in the 1990s they increased by 57%.

C] newspaper, in the 1990s they increased to 57%.

D] newspaper; increasing to 57% in the 1990s.

E] newspaper, which increased to 57% in the 1990s.






[spoiler]The OA is the sentence itself i.e A.

[/spoiler]


[spoiler]Option B: 'they' a pronoun is ambigious as it is unknown that 'they' refers to what, advertising revenues or the operating profits...

Option C: same as option B...

Option D: semicolon not required as in the second clause as mentioned in the option, the overall clause cannot stand on its own. There is no subject or the clear verb. Moreover, it seems to be a modifier and so a comma should be placed and not a semi-colon.

Option E: The use of a comma and then a which, modifies the word newspaper meaning that the newspaper increased to 57% in the 1990's and not the ratio. It changes the meaning of the sentence.[/spoiler]


Hope this helps...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by killer1387 » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:51 pm
A is correct.
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:16 am
In the 1980s advertising revenues accounted for approximately 40% of operating profits of a typical local newspaper ; in the 1990s this proportion increased to 57%.


A] newspaper; in the 1990s this proportion increased to 57%.

B] newspaper; in the 1990s they increased by 57%.

C] newspaper, in the 1990s they increased to 57%.

D] newspaper; increasing to 57% in the 1990s.

E] newspaper, which increased to 57% in the 1990s.

IMO: A
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:03 am
A] Semicolon used correctly, two independent clauses. Works pretty well.

B] "increased by" changes the meaning

C] cannot use a comma to link two independent clauses

D] need an independent clause after the semicolon

E] modifier error: it's not the newspaper that increased
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:34 am
Bill@VeritasPrep wrote: C] cannot use a comma to link two independent clauses
Bill if we use a semi-colon in C then would it be correct. I think it wouldn;t
In the 1980s advertising revenues accounted for approximately 40% of operating profits of a typical local newspaper ; in the 1990s they increased to 57%


advertising revenues CANNOT increase to some % (57%) AND i do not see any parallelism going on here which can imply underlined part in italics - advertising revenues increased to 57% of operating profits
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:16 am
Experts please help me resolve this
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:32 am
It isn't so difficult that no one can reply :)
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by vikram4689 » Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:24 am
Come on friends :)
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Join the discussion

by chris@magoosh » Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:16 pm
@vikram4689

Modified (C): In the 1980s advertising revenues accounted for approximately 40% of operating profits of a typical local newspaper ; in the 1990s they increased to 57%

This sentence is fine from a semi-colon perspective: two independent clauses are being joined together.

From a meaning standpoint, you are correct: it is not the % that is increasing, rather a % of operating profits. Therefore, 'they' is incorrect.

Hope that helps resolve any confusion :).
Join the discussion

by rahatali » Thu Jan 09, 2014 11:44 am
I need some clarification on the use of PRONOUN in clauses separated by a semi-colon. According to the rule of semi-colon, a pronoun in clause after semi-colon should not refer to a noun in clause before semi-colon. Clearly, Option A violates this rule. For instance, option A says that "newspaper; in the 1990s THIS PROPORTION increased to 57%". Use of THIS PROPORTION here is unclear because it is referring to something defined in previous clause.

I rejected option A from my choices just because of this logic. Now, I am confused whether the rule is wrong OR I don't understand it properly.

Please help.
Thanks.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1