BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A recently proposed law would accomplish the goal of protect

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pmFollowed by: 23 members
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:10 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

A recently proposed law would accomplish the goal of protecting Florida's manatee population without the loss of revenue from stipulations of restriction on the tourist and fishing industries by previously proposed laws.

(A) stipulations of restriction on the tourist and fishing industries by previously proposed laws
(B) stipulations by previously proposed laws of restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries
(C) stipulations for restrictions on the fishing industries and the tourist industry of previously proposed laws
(D) restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries that were stipulated by laws proposed previously
(E) restrictions on the tourist and fishing industries stipulated by previously proposed laws

OA E

Source: Princeton Review
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:09 pm
The loss of revenue should follow a parallelism on the exact subject that is being lost.
So loss of revenue from restrictions why? restriction cause the loss.

Option A :- Incorrect
This does not follow parallelism and the right syntax is not obeyed. Stipulations by will be chosen over stipulations of

Option B :- Incorrect
Suffers the same fate as Option A above. It does not follow parallelism.

Option C :- Incorrect
Stipulations for is totally out of this world and is a bad English combo!

Option D :- Incorrect
This actually follows the right parallelism, but the sentence was flawed at the middle, the use of that were sounds tautological and it is not required, also makes the sentence verbose.

Option E :- correct
This Option is concise, follows parallelism and syntax.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1