BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A recent spate of launching...

Expert replies
by bpgen » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:40 am
A recent spate of launching and operating mishaps with television satellites led to a corresponding surge in claims against companies underwriting satellite insurance. As a result, insurance premiums shot up, making satellites more expensive to launch and operate. This, in turn, has added to the pressure to squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites.

Which of the following, if true, taken together with the information above, best supports the conclusion that the cost of television satellites will continue to increase?

A. Since the risk to insurers of satellites is spread over relatively few units, insurance premiums are necessarily
very high.
B. When satellites reach orbit and then fail, the causes of failure are generally impossible to pinpoint with
confidence.
C. The greater the performance demands placed on satellites, the more frequently those satellites break down.
D. Most satellites are produced in such small numbers that no economies of scale can be realized.
E. Since many satellites are built by unwieldy international consortia, inefficiencies are inevitable.
"Ambition is the path to success. Persistence is the vehicle you arrive in."
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bpgen » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:41 am
OA C
"Ambition is the path to success. Persistence is the vehicle you arrive in."
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:25 pm
The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by bvn » Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:02 am
grockit_andrea wrote:The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Thank you Andrea. I have matter of understanding the meaning of "squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites"

Squeeze something out: = to exclude something out ( here is performance) ( As LongMan Dictionary said)

is it right?
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:39 am
bvn wrote:
grockit_andrea wrote:The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Thank you Andrea. I have matter of understanding the meaning of "squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites"

Squeeze something out: = to exclude something out ( here is performance) ( As LongMan Dictionary said)

is it right?


Squeeze more performance -- As in Overburden or overload the satellite to service more people, hihgher than its Capacity to service.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:16 am
bvn wrote:
grockit_andrea wrote:The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Thank you Andrea. I have matter of understanding the meaning of "squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites"

Squeeze something out: = to exclude something out ( here is performance) ( As LongMan Dictionary said)

is it right?


Shawshank is correct, and so are you, bvn; one meaning of "squeeze out" is to exclude, but another is to force production beyond expected capacity. For instance, someone lifting weights at the gym might refer to "squeezing out one more set" when she's trying to push past her normal limits. It's that latter meaning that's being used here. Confusing, I know, but at least you're finding out now, so if it comes up on the actual test, you'll understand both meanings!
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:19 pm
:) C
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion