Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

A recent spate of launching...

Expert replies
by bpgen » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:40 am
A recent spate of launching and operating mishaps with television satellites led to a corresponding surge in claims against companies underwriting satellite insurance. As a result, insurance premiums shot up, making satellites more expensive to launch and operate. This, in turn, has added to the pressure to squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites.

Which of the following, if true, taken together with the information above, best supports the conclusion that the cost of television satellites will continue to increase?

A. Since the risk to insurers of satellites is spread over relatively few units, insurance premiums are necessarily
very high.
B. When satellites reach orbit and then fail, the causes of failure are generally impossible to pinpoint with
confidence.
C. The greater the performance demands placed on satellites, the more frequently those satellites break down.
D. Most satellites are produced in such small numbers that no economies of scale can be realized.
E. Since many satellites are built by unwieldy international consortia, inefficiencies are inevitable.
“Ambition is the path to success. Persistence is the vehicle you arrive in.”
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bpgen » Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:41 am
OA C
“Ambition is the path to success. Persistence is the vehicle you arrive in.”
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:25 pm
The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by bvn » Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:02 am
grockit_andrea wrote:The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Thank you Andrea. I have matter of understanding the meaning of "squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites"

Squeeze something out: = to exclude something out ( here is performance) ( As LongMan Dictionary said)

is it right?
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:39 am
bvn wrote:
grockit_andrea wrote:The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Thank you Andrea. I have matter of understanding the meaning of "squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites"

Squeeze something out: = to exclude something out ( here is performance) ( As LongMan Dictionary said)

is it right?


Squeeze more performance -- As in Overburden or overload the satellite to service more people, hihgher than its Capacity to service.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:16 am
bvn wrote:
grockit_andrea wrote:The satellites are caught in a vicious cycle: mishaps led to more claims, more claims led to higher premiums, higher premiums made satellite use more expensive, higher expenses led to higher demands on satellite performance. Choice C closes the "circle" of issues here because, if satellites are going to fail more due to high performance demands, then there will be more claims, and the whole thing will start all over again.
Thank you Andrea. I have matter of understanding the meaning of "squeeze more performance out of currently operating satellites"

Squeeze something out: = to exclude something out ( here is performance) ( As LongMan Dictionary said)

is it right?


Shawshank is correct, and so are you, bvn; one meaning of "squeeze out" is to exclude, but another is to force production beyond expected capacity. For instance, someone lifting weights at the gym might refer to "squeezing out one more set" when she's trying to push past her normal limits. It's that latter meaning that's being used here. Confusing, I know, but at least you're finding out now, so if it comes up on the actual test, you'll understand both meanings!
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by arora007 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:19 pm
:) C
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Join the discussion