BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A recent review of pay scales

Expert replies
by priyankamishra11 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:11 pm
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

Please explain your answers.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by vivek.kapoor83 » Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:09 pm
indicate will be followed by 'that' here , So, DE are out
Out of ABC, B uses compares....which should be compared.
So, we are down to A & C
IMO A
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:39 am
that is needed.
without that D becomes a "run on" sentence.

E: indicates ceos now earning an average of 419 times
review is not indicating particular ceos.

C: their does not have any clear antecedent. also if you reread the whole sentence it will sound weird.

A: "more pay than blue collar workers" is wrong comparison

IMO B is the answer.

Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by nikhilagrawal » Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:33 am
Is B the answer. I still doubt abt .. compares ..
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:24 am
choosing between A and B, i'd probably go with B, the last section comparing the ratio seems better constructed to me.
Join the discussion

by priyankamishra11 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:29 am
OA is B.
But I dont undersyand why A is wrong.

a ratio that compares to 42 times in 1980 in B seems wrong.

Please Explain.
Regards,
Priyanka
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:59 am
CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers

CEOs can not more more than blue-collar workers
they can earn more than blue-collar workers' pay

Please let me know if you need a detailed description about the topic.
Join the discussion

by priyankamishra11 » Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:03 pm
Thanks I got it now.
Got it . Comparison problem but it really sucks.. :evil:
Regards,
Priyanka
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:22 am
priyankamishra11 wrote:Thanks I got it now.
Got it . Comparison problem but it really sucks.. :evil:
RON HAS mentioned in his blog that C is the answer...I am yet trying to diges tthat..

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/gma ... t1889.html

choice b is badly worded: 'compares to 42 times in 1980' seems to say that, on forty-two different occasions in 1980, the ceo:blue-collar ratio reached 419:1. this is not what we are trying to say.

more generally, when speaking about ratios as is done here, you cannot leave 'times' hanging like this. sometimes you can use pronouns - the height of the sears tower is more than four times that of the statue of liberty - but you can't use empty space.

choice c exhibits proper usage of 'times' followed by their pay. it also uses the ratio, a correct identification of exactly what is being described.
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:38 pm
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:04 am
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO�s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO�s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times - Passive
B. that, on average, CEO�s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
C. that, on average, CEO�s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
D. CEO�s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
E. CEO�s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

IMO: B
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1