BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a question from a sentence from nytimes

Expert replies
by 1947 » Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:13 am
The audience in Oslo's City Hall, which included the Norwegian royal family, listened raptly, applauding often, standing to clap when Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi entered the hall and when she finished her speech, which was at the same time modest, personal and touching, an appeal to find practical ways to reduce the inextinguishable suffering of the world.

'listened', 'applauding' and 'standing' are parallel. Why is there no AND before 'standing'.

or am I wrong in saying these 3 are parallel.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by dimochka » Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:05 pm
If the three verbs were parallel, you could substitute them for each other without adding anything to the sentence, and grammatically it should still work.

The audience [...] listened raptly - OK
The audience [...] applauding often - Doesn't work the same way
The audience [...] standing to clap - Also doesn't work the same way

While i'm not saying that these phrases cannot all be in the same sentence, I wouldn't say that they're parallel. Parallelism would be "listened", "applauded", and "stood".
Join the discussion

by 1947 » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:07 am
dimochka wrote:If the three verbs were parallel, you could substitute them for each other without adding anything to the sentence, and grammatically it should still work.

The audience [...] listened raptly - OK
The audience [...] applauding often - Doesn't work the same way
The audience [...] standing to clap - Also doesn't work the same way

While i'm not saying that these phrases cannot all be in the same sentence, I wouldn't say that they're parallel. Parallelism would be "listened", "applauded", and "stood".
The audience in Oslo's City Hall listened raptly, applauding often, standing to clap when Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi entered the hall.

If we shorten the sentence to above.
then "applauding often" would be a modifier to "listened raptly"
AND "standing to clap" a modifier for "applauding often".
Please confirm if I am thinking correct now...I understand now that these are not parallel. Thanks for explaining that.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1