BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A question about the usage of "that" from OG 10

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by aj5105 » Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:11 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by stubbornp » Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:02 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:32 am
Choice E is best. The pronoun that in A and B should be deleted, since the pronoun one is sufficient to introduce
the modifier and the sentence is more fluid without that. In B and C, it and that it are intrusive and
ungrammatical: the idiom is "believe x to be y." In the context of this sentence, the infinitive to be is more
appropriate than the limited present-tense is in referring to an event that occurred long ago but has been
discovered only recently. Finally, A, B, and D lack o/and so illogically equate this particular explosion with the
whole class of explosions to which it belongs: it is not a type but possibly one of a type.

this explanation is from OG10
Join the discussion

by bie.freelance » Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:13 am
i think E
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1