BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A new handheld device purports to determine the severity of

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:50 pm
A new handheld device purports to determine the severity of concussions by reading the brain's electrical signals and comparing them to a database of 15,000 scans compiled at a brain research lab. The device is intended to help doctors decide whether an athlete who has received a blow to the head during a competition should be sent back into the game.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the device for its intended purpose?

A. Whether the database of brain scans will regularly be updated with new scans
B. Whether by use of this device doctors will be able to make a sound decision about whether to allow an athlete back into the competition before it ends
C. Whether the device will be endorsed by a large number of medical professionals
D. Whether the database includes scans of non-injured athletes in the same game as the injured athlete
E. Whether team doctors have until now been mistaken in their assessments of whether an athlete can safely continue to play

OA B

Source: Official Guide
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Nov 16, 2019 1:58 am
Premise: A new handheld device purports to determine the severity of concussions by reading the brain's electrical signals and comparing them to a database of 15,000 scans compiled at a brain research lab.

Conclusion: The new handheld device is intended to help doctors decide whether an athlete who has received a blow in the head during competition should be sent back into the game.

Option A - Incorrect:
The brain's electrical signals were to be compared to a database of 15,000 scans, and not to be regularly updated with new scans as this will not serve the intended purpose of the device. Therefore, this option doesn't hold any claim to be correct.

Option B - Correct:
This is accurate. According to the passage, the device was intended to determine the severity of concussions, and this will further help doctors to make a sound decision about whether an athlete who has received a blow in the head during competition should be sent back into the game".

Option C - Incorrect:
This argument is not concerned about the endorsement of the device by a large number of medical professionals rather it is concerned about the device's effectiveness and ease of helping doctors make a good decision.

Option D - Incorrect:
We can't know from the passage if the database of the 15,000 scans includes the scans of both non-injured and injured athletes. So, this option is not valid.

Option E - Incorrect:
According to the passage, no assessment was carried out by team doctors. Hence, we can't know whether team doctors have until now been mistaken in their assessments of whether an athlete can safely continue to play.
Join the discussion