BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A large number of Wempro Corporation's department

Expert replies
by NandishSS » Wed Jul 27, 2016 6:11 am
Which of the following provides the most logical completion of the argument?

A large number of Wempro Corporation's department heads will retire this year. The number of employees with the qualifications now required for promotion to department head equals only half the expected vacancies. Wempro is not going to hire department heads from outside the company, have current department heads take over more than one department, or reduce the number of its departments. So some departments will be without department heads next year, since Wempro will not ______________

A) reduce the qualifications for promotion to department head
B) reduce the average number of employees per department
C) reduce the responsibilities of each department
D) promote more than one employee from any department to serve as heads of departments
E) promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions

OA:A

Source -GMATPrep EP2

Please explain POE
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:36 am
NandishSS wrote:Which of the following provides the most logical completion of the argument?

A large number of Wempro Corporation's department heads will retire this year. The number of employees with the qualifications now required for promotion to department head equals only half the expected vacancies. Wempro is not going to hire department heads from outside the company, have current department heads take over more than one department, or reduce the number of its departments. So some departments will be without department heads next year, since Wempro will not ______________

A) reduce the qualifications for promotion to department head
B) reduce the average number of employees per department
C) reduce the responsibilities of each department
D) promote more than one employee from any department to serve as heads of departments
E) promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
Premise:
The number of employees with the qualifications to be promoted to department head is equal to only half the expected vacancies.
Conclusion:
Some departments will be without department heads next year, since Wempro will not DO X.
Conclusion, rephrased:
If Wempro DID X, all departments could have department heads.

The correct answer choice must show how all departments could have department heads.

A) reduce the qualifications for promotion to department head
If Wempro were to reduce the qualifications for promotion, then all departments could have department heads, since the only reason for the expected vacancies is a lack of qualified employees.

The correct answer is A.

B) reduce the average number of employees per department
If Wempro were to reduce the average number of employees per department, some departments would still be without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate B.

C) reduce the responsibilities of each department
If Wempro were to reduce the responsibilities of each department, some departments would still be without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate C.

D) promote more than one employee from any department to serve as heads of departments
If Wempro were willing to promote more than one employee from any department, some departments would still be without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate D.

E) promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
If Wempro were to promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions, the result would be an INCREASE in the number of departments without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

Re:

by gui_guimaraes » Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:22 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Thu Jul 28, 2016 4:36 am
NandishSS wrote:Which of the following provides the most logical completion of the argument?

A large number of Wempro Corporation's department heads will retire this year. The number of employees with the qualifications now required for promotion to department head equals only half the expected vacancies. Wempro is not going to hire department heads from outside the company, have current department heads take over more than one department, or reduce the number of its departments. So some departments will be without department heads next year, since Wempro will not ______________

A) reduce the qualifications for promotion to department head
B) reduce the average number of employees per department
C) reduce the responsibilities of each department
D) promote more than one employee from any department to serve as heads of departments
E) promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
Premise:
The number of employees with the qualifications to be promoted to department head is equal to only half the expected vacancies.
Conclusion:
Some departments will be without department heads next year, since Wempro will not DO X.
Conclusion, rephrased:
If Wempro DID X, all departments could have department heads.

The correct answer choice must show how all departments could have department heads.

A) reduce the qualifications for promotion to department head
If Wempro were to reduce the qualifications for promotion, then all departments could have department heads, since the only reason for the expected vacancies is a lack of qualified employees.

The correct answer is A.

B) reduce the average number of employees per department
If Wempro were to reduce the average number of employees per department, some departments would still be without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate B.

C) reduce the responsibilities of each department
If Wempro were to reduce the responsibilities of each department, some departments would still be without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate C.

D) promote more than one employee from any department to serve as heads of departments
If Wempro were willing to promote more than one employee from any department, some departments would still be without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate D.

E) promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions
If Wempro were to promote any current department heads to higher-level managerial positions, the result would be an INCREASE in the number of departments without department heads, since -- according to the premise -- not enough lower-level employees have the qualifications to be promoted to department head.
Eliminate E.
@GMATGuruNY Regarding (D), the argument says that only the number of employees with the qualifications now required for promotion to department head equals only HALF the expected vacancies, so what if there were 10 departments heads and 5 available potential candidates and these 5 employees be promoted to take care of 2 departments each? Wouldn't that work? Tks! :)
Join the discussion