BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a kaplan CR

Expert replies
by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:42 pm
Enrollment in graduate and professional programs tends to be high in a strong economy and much lower during reccessions. the perceived likelihood of future job availability, therefore, affects people's willingness to pass up immediate earning potential in order to invest in career related training.

the argument above assumes that
A. the perceived likelihood of job availability has decreased in recent years
B. all those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of futre job.
C. perceptions of the likelihood of job availability are related of the state of the economy.
D. those who enroll in graduate and professional schools during a strong economy help increase the economy's strength.
E. graduate and professional programs admit fewer students during recessions.

i dont have OA
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by reply2spg » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:47 pm
Is it B?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by Tani » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:01 pm
The answer is D. The new term in the conclusion is perception of job availability - it must be linked to enrollment. D is the only one that relates enrollment in school to perceptions about the economy.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:55 pm
I would like to go with C
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:57 pm
Mam Tani Wolff - Are you sure its D

Or you wanted to select C and mentioned D by mistake
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by Tani » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:06 pm
Of course I meant C - just a typo - The one about perceptions is the correct one.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by psychomath » Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:21 am
C it should be...Thankfully that was a typo - above :-)
Join the discussion

by g000fy » Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:44 am
Tani Wolff - Kaplan wrote:Of course I meant C - just a typo - The one about perceptions is the correct one.
Lol. I chose C too. Your previous response had confused me :roll:
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:56 am
May be one can edit the OA in the original post. By the time reader comes to read this, he is shaken :) .
Join the discussion

by focusgmat » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:40 am
Can anyone explain to me why option B is incorrect based on the negation rule for assumption question ? I feel I am making mistakes in assumption questions.

Will appreciate if any one can help me understand the negation rule when applied on option B and C in the above question.

My thoughts -

I chose B because I used the negation rules as follows.

B) NONE of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

This negation is weakening the conclusion of the arg. Hence , option B is the answer.

Please help. I learned this strategy from Manhattan strategy guides.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:08 am
focusgmat wrote:Can anyone explain to me why option B is incorrect based on the negation rule for assumption question ? I feel I am making mistakes in assumption questions.

Will appreciate if any one can help me understand the negation rule when applied on option B and C in the above question.

My thoughts -

I chose B because I used the negation rules as follows.

B) NONE of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

This negation is weakening the conclusion of the arg. Hence , option B is the answer.

Please help. I learned this strategy from Manhattan strategy guides.
The negation of ALL isn't NONE. Instead, the negation of ALL is NOT ALL or "only some".
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by focusgmat » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:29 pm
Thank you, Testluv.
I corrected my notes as well. Now I understand why option B (using negation rule) doesn't weaken the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:49 am
Testluv wrote:
focusgmat wrote:Can anyone explain to me why option B is incorrect based on the negation rule for assumption question ? I feel I am making mistakes in assumption questions.

Will appreciate if any one can help me understand the negation rule when applied on option B and C in the above question.

My thoughts -

I chose B because I used the negation rules as follows.

B) NONE of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

This negation is weakening the conclusion of the arg. Hence , option B is the answer.

Please help. I learned this strategy from Manhattan strategy guides.
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do not do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

The negation of ALL isn't NONE. Instead, the negation of ALL is NOT ALL or "only some".
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

1)All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

2)All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do not do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
How do we apply the negation rule .Is it 1) or 2)?
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:04 am
Hi Munda,

it would be neither 1 nor 2.

The negation of ALL DO would be NOT ALL DO or SOME DON'T. So it would be:

NOT all those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of futre job

which, here, for greater clarity we can rephrase to:

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do NOT do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs

or

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so for reasons other than the perceived lack of future jobs.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:09 am
Testluv wrote:Hi Munda,

it would be neither 1 nor 2.

The negation of ALL DO would be NOT ALL DO or SOME DON'T. So it would be:

NOT all those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of futre job

which, here, for greater clarity we can rephrase to:

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do NOT do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs

or

Some of those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so for reasons other than the perceived lack of future jobs.
All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

1)Not All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.

2)All those who avoid graduate and professional school during an economic slump do not do so because of the perceived lack of future jobs.
Edited option 1. sorries problem with my browser or ie.
How do we apply the negation rule .Is it 1) or 2)?
Join the discussion