BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a kaplan CR

Expert replies
by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:25 pm
the number of applicants applying to top graduate programs has declined by more than 10% since the mid-1990s,
however the number of students admitted to these same programs has not decreased commensurately and the caliber of the students admitted, as measured by their undergraduate GPAs and standardized test scores, has actually improved markedly.
which of the following, if true, best explains the seemingly contractictory trends decribed above?
A. the number of applicants applying to second and third tier graduate programs has also declined by more than 10% since the mid 1990s
B. many potential graduate school applicants are put off by the ever increasing cost of a graduate education.
C. Because of improved economic opportunities, general interest in leaving the work force to go to graduate school has waned in recent years
D. the greater premium awarded to degrees from top graduate programs has made the applicants pool increasingly competitive, discouraging those with less impressive academic records from applying
E. the number of women applying to top graduate programs has increased since the mid-1990s, while at the same time the number of men applying to top graduate programs has declined.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatrix » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:38 pm
my pick D
it best explains why competitive applicants pool has actually improved.....and why the number of applicants applying to top graduate programs has declined....thus imho.... D best explains the seemingly contradictory trends described....
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:54 pm
IMO D. D explains both sides, why applicants are few and why admitted are more.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by Tani » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:13 pm
Although I would like to think the increased proportion of women is driving the quality of the pool up, I'm afraid that logically I have to go with D.

Assume last year the average GMAT (to use a single measure) was 650 and there were a thousand students applying. Then this year, those that would have been in the bottom 200 ( GMAT scores from 550 - 650) decided not to apply because they figured they wouldn't get in. The remaining 800 might have an average of 700. From that group only 200 need be selected so even out of 800 applicants there would be plenty of high-scoring candidates so that the average GMAT could be maintained or even increased.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion