BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a kaplan CR

Expert replies
by diebeatsthegmat » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:25 pm
the number of applicants applying to top graduate programs has declined by more than 10% since the mid-1990s,
however the number of students admitted to these same programs has not decreased commensurately and the caliber of the students admitted, as measured by their undergraduate GPAs and standardized test scores, has actually improved markedly.
which of the following, if true, best explains the seemingly contractictory trends decribed above?
A. the number of applicants applying to second and third tier graduate programs has also declined by more than 10% since the mid 1990s
B. many potential graduate school applicants are put off by the ever increasing cost of a graduate education.
C. Because of improved economic opportunities, general interest in leaving the work force to go to graduate school has waned in recent years
D. the greater premium awarded to degrees from top graduate programs has made the applicants pool increasingly competitive, discouraging those with less impressive academic records from applying
E. the number of women applying to top graduate programs has increased since the mid-1990s, while at the same time the number of men applying to top graduate programs has declined.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatrix » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:38 pm
my pick D
it best explains why competitive applicants pool has actually improved.....and why the number of applicants applying to top graduate programs has declined....thus imho.... D best explains the seemingly contradictory trends described....
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:54 pm
IMO D. D explains both sides, why applicants are few and why admitted are more.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by Tani » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:13 pm
Although I would like to think the increased proportion of women is driving the quality of the pool up, I'm afraid that logically I have to go with D.

Assume last year the average GMAT (to use a single measure) was 650 and there were a thousand students applying. Then this year, those that would have been in the bottom 200 ( GMAT scores from 550 - 650) decided not to apply because they figured they wouldn't get in. The remaining 800 might have an average of 700. From that group only 200 need be selected so even out of 800 applicants there would be plenty of high-scoring candidates so that the average GMAT could be maintained or even increased.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion