BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A decade

Expert replies
by vidhya16 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:19 pm
A decade after the demise of early entrants such as Webvan, each of the successful competitors in the online home-delivery industry have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have existing strengths in logistics for traditional "bricks and mortar" stores.

(A)have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have
(B)either have developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have
(C)has developed either new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already
(D)either has developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already has
(E)has either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or has already

Ta
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by mirantdon » Sat Jul 16, 2011 11:17 pm
+1 for D.
Join the discussion

by nileshdalvi » Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:13 am
A decade after the demise of early entrants such as Webvan, each of the successful competitors in the online home-delivery industry have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have existing strengths in logistics for traditional "bricks and mortar" stores.

(A)have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have
(B)either have developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have
(C)has developed either new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already
(D)either has developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already has
(E)has either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or has already

Ta

>>
A,B - Clearly Subject Verb Disagreement.

C - Either X or Y should have X and Y parallel. Are "existing strengths in logistics for traditional "bricks and mortar" stores. " developed? No, they are already existing. So, positioning "either" after "has developed" changes the original meaning of the sentence, even though it is grammatically correct.

D - Again X and Y in "Either X or Y" have to be parallel.
"has developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities" - X (verb + noun)
"already has existing strengths ..." - Y (adverb + verb + noun)


E - "developed something" and "has already existing..." are parallel and have "verb + noun" format.

IMO E.
Join the discussion

by gaurav1083 » Sun Jul 17, 2011 9:31 am
+1 for D
Use of have is wrong - A and B are out
C is wrong because of wrong construction.
E is wrong because of usage of has haseither ..... or has[/u]
Join the discussion

by ColumbiaVC » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:41 am
+1 for D
Join the discussion

by Chaitanya_1986 » Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:22 pm
A decade after the demise of early entrants such as Webvan, each of the successful competitors in the online home-delivery industry have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have existing strengths in logistics for traditional "bricks and mortar" stores.

(A)have either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have
(B)either have developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already have
(C)has developed either new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already
(D)either has developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or already has
(E)has either developed new world-class supply-chain capabilities or has already

Friends its this way.....

Give predominance for Each if it comes first....else if it comes after some subject then give for Subject....

In the above sentence.....the word each has to be given more stress....So has should be used rather than have....Knock out options A and B
Check for parallelism now...

No need to tell which one is parallel...its none other than D
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1