BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a cr from gmatclub

Expert replies
by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:45 am
The cost of transatlantic airfare has nearly doubled over the past five years, yet airlines are doing a booming business. Clearly, people today have more money to spend on vacations than they did five years ago.

All of the following, if true, would weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Most people buying transatlantic tickets today use them for business trips, so airfare is refunded by their companies.
(B) There are fewer airlines in existence today than five years ago.
(C) People are taking shorter vacations and staying in cheaper hotels than they used to.
(D) Crossing the Atlantic by ship requires more time than most people can afford.
(E) Domestic airline flights have seen a steady increase in passengers
[spoiler]
can you guys please explain why not C? E and C are not able to weaken the argument. why is E better than C?[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by maihuna » Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:59 am
Who says C is not weakening, it contradicts the conclusion that people are having more money to spend on vaccation.
diebeatsthegmat wrote:The cost of transatlantic airfare has nearly doubled over the past five years, yet airlines are doing a booming business. Clearly, people today have more money to spend on vacations than they did five years ago.

All of the following, if true, would weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Most people buying transatlantic tickets today use them for business trips, so airfare is refunded by their companies.
(B) There are fewer airlines in existence today than five years ago.
(C) People are taking shorter vacations and staying in cheaper hotels than they used to.
(D) Crossing the Atlantic by ship requires more time than most people can afford.
(E) Domestic airline flights have seen a steady increase in passengers
[spoiler]
can you guys please explain why not C? E and C are not able to weaken the argument. why is E better than C?[/spoiler]
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by Night reader » Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:41 am
@maihuna, I think this CR entry was artificially complicated by its author(s). Choice C introduced an assumption which makes the conclusion not logical. BUT choice C, also brings about comparison of unknown relative data - shorter vacations, cheaper hotels ...

I think what artificially complicates this entry is adding flavor with the boom in airlines' industry. The choice E invalidates the conclusion of more money spent by customers for vacations by saying that that the growth in revenues of airlines was steady - that is nothing unusual happened this year than it was five or several years ago.
diebeatsthegmat wrote:The cost of transatlantic airfare has nearly doubled over the past five years, yet airlines are doing a booming business. Clearly, people today have more money to spend on vacations than they did five years ago.

All of the following, if true, would weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Most people buying transatlantic tickets today use them for business trips, so airfare is refunded by their companies.
(B) There are fewer airlines in existence today than five years ago.
(C) People are taking shorter vacations and staying in cheaper hotels than they used to.
(D) Crossing the Atlantic by ship requires more time than most people can afford.
(E) Domestic airline flights have seen a steady increase in passengers
[spoiler]
can you guys please explain why not C? E and C are not able to weaken the argument. why is E better than C?[/spoiler]
My knowledge frontiers came to evolve the GMATPill's methods - the credited study means to boost the Verbal competence. I really like their videos, especially for RC, CR and SC. You do check their study methods at https://www.gmatpill.com
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:43 pm
Why no body considers D as a contendor .

(D) Crossing the Atlantic by ship requires more time than most people can afford.

D says crossing the atlantic takes more time then MOST people can afford , then it is logical says that's why they take flights. SO it is lack of time not more of money leading to more passangers and ,hence, the air fair increase.

Edit response: ohh, yes that's why it weakens the argument :)
Join the discussion

by nikhilsrl » Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:59 pm
I am not getting it, I think all of them weaken the argument.
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:29 pm
diebeatsthegmat wrote: can you guys please explain why not C? E and C are not able to weaken the argument. why is E better than C?
(C) People are taking shorter vacations and staying in cheaper hotels than they used to.
People are taking shorter vacations and staying in cheaper hotels in order to compensate for the cost they are spending on airfare. Thus, this weakens the argument and discarded as the answer choice.

(E) Domestic airline flights have seen a steady increase in passengers
Honestly, I reached this option by the process of elimination and have no precise idea on why this is correct!
If I comment anything on this point then I would be commenting just because I read the spoiler above! :D
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by sakali » Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:50 am
E is correct because E is out of scope.


It talks about domestic flights...the question is concerned with Transatlantic flights; not domestic.
Join the discussion

by mk101 » Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:00 pm
diebeatsthegmat wrote:The cost of transatlantic airfare has nearly doubled over the past five years, yet airlines are doing a booming business. Clearly, people today have more money to spend on vacations than they did five years ago.

All of the following, if true, would weaken the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) Most people buying transatlantic tickets today use them for business trips, so airfare is refunded by their companies.
(B) There are fewer airlines in existence today than five years ago.
(C) People are taking shorter vacations and staying in cheaper hotels than they used to.
(D) Crossing the Atlantic by ship requires more time than most people can afford.
(E) Domestic airline flights have seen a steady increase in passengers
[spoiler]
can you guys please explain why not C? E and C are not able to weaken the argument. why is E better than C?[/spoiler]

I think E is the answer . We do not want to weaken the argument that says -"people have more money that they did 5 years back: - Option E is the only option that does not weaken; it suggests that peope, infact, may have more money, enabling them to take domestic flights in larger numbers.

Option C in fact weakens the argument, as suggested by some of the other members above...If people are taking shorter vacations and staying in cheaper hotels, they probably have less money than they did before.
Join the discussion