BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A 17th century artist

Expert replies
by gmatdriller » Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:21 am
A fossil with the name of a certain seventeenth-century artist was found to contain traces of a pigment called hangzhou Zaceous. Because this pigment was unavailable until the twentieth century, it can be inferred that the fossil was actually painted by someone else.

Which of the following assumptions was made on the basis of the conclusion above?

A. Imitations of seventeenth-century fossils were made in the twentieth century and later.
B. The artist whose name was inscribed on the mural was accomplished but not innovative.
C. Traces of the hangzhou Zaceous pigment were found throughout the fossil.
D. The hangzhou Zaceous pigment was used when the fossil was originally painted.
E. The hangzhou Zaceous pigment was combined with other pigments in a manner typical of the seventeenth century.

Can someone please analyze the choices...
OA is D.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by anirudh.n » Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:01 am
IMO D...
A- is irrelevant as the premise states that this pigment was unavailable till 20th century.
B- is also irrelevant, it does not matter whether the author was a accomplished or not.
C- This is some what related to the premise but does not give a convincing assumption to arrive at the conclusion
D- correct, as the pigment was unavailable till the 20th century but the fossil contains the pigment, the fossil might have been painted by someone else in the 20th century when the pigment was actually available. D merely states that the pigment was used in painting the fossil, hence shows that the pigment was available.
E- irrelevant
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:22 am
Thanks !!!a very good reasoning
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:42 am
Hi Anirudh,

the inference (painting done by someone else) relies on the fact that the pigment was only available
in the 20th century-3 centuries away and the artist couldn't have lived that long.
However, if you negate C (the pigment was not used when the fossil was originally painted), does that
destroy the argument? After all, the pigment could have been used in the 21st century and we could still infer that the painting was done by someone else...
Join the discussion

by anirudh.n » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:27 pm
Gmatdriller,

You have negated the sentence in the extreme possible way. The negation must be 'the pigment might not have been necessarily used when the fossil was originally painted' when you use this to negate the conclusion, the conclusion does not become meaningful, rather it supports the conclusion. Hence C is not the correct answer. When you use the negation technique it must make the conclusion look absurd and not help by being a premise to arrive at the conclusion.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
Join the discussion