Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

A 17th century artist

Expert replies
by gmatdriller » Thu Oct 04, 2012 3:21 am
A fossil with the name of a certain seventeenth-century artist was found to contain traces of a pigment called hangzhou Zaceous. Because this pigment was unavailable until the twentieth century, it can be inferred that the fossil was actually painted by someone else.

Which of the following assumptions was made on the basis of the conclusion above?

A. Imitations of seventeenth-century fossils were made in the twentieth century and later.
B. The artist whose name was inscribed on the mural was accomplished but not innovative.
C. Traces of the hangzhou Zaceous pigment were found throughout the fossil.
D. The hangzhou Zaceous pigment was used when the fossil was originally painted.
E. The hangzhou Zaceous pigment was combined with other pigments in a manner typical of the seventeenth century.

Can someone please analyze the choices...
OA is D.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by anirudh.n » Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:01 am
IMO D...
A- is irrelevant as the premise states that this pigment was unavailable till 20th century.
B- is also irrelevant, it does not matter whether the author was a accomplished or not.
C- This is some what related to the premise but does not give a convincing assumption to arrive at the conclusion
D- correct, as the pigment was unavailable till the 20th century but the fossil contains the pigment, the fossil might have been painted by someone else in the 20th century when the pigment was actually available. D merely states that the pigment was used in painting the fossil, hence shows that the pigment was available.
E- irrelevant
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:22 am
Thanks !!!a very good reasoning
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:42 am
Hi Anirudh,

the inference (painting done by someone else) relies on the fact that the pigment was only available
in the 20th century-3 centuries away and the artist couldn't have lived that long.
However, if you negate C (the pigment was not used when the fossil was originally painted), does that
destroy the argument? After all, the pigment could have been used in the 21st century and we could still infer that the painting was done by someone else...
Join the discussion

by anirudh.n » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:27 pm
Gmatdriller,

You have negated the sentence in the extreme possible way. The negation must be 'the pigment might not have been necessarily used when the fossil was originally painted' when you use this to negate the conclusion, the conclusion does not become meaningful, rather it supports the conclusion. Hence C is not the correct answer. When you use the negation technique it must make the conclusion look absurd and not help by being a premise to arrive at the conclusion.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
Join the discussion