780+ CR's
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
D
Only choice D relates to Color difference in weeds and crops...
A is irrelevant as it distinguishes between Colors of different weeds.. not the color difference between weeds and crops...
Only choice D relates to Color difference in weeds and crops...
A is irrelevant as it distinguishes between Colors of different weeds.. not the color difference between weeds and crops...
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
- Thanked: 104 times
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
- Thanked: 17 times
IMO D
Next one is as follows :
A company plans to develop a prototype weeding machine that uses cutting blades with optical sensors and microprocessors that distinguish weeds from crop plants by differences in shade of color. The inventor of the machine claims that it will reduce labor costs by virtually eliminating the need for manual weeding.
Which of the following is a consideration in favor of the company’s implementing its plan to develop the prototype?
A. There is a considerable degree of variation in shade of color between weeds of different species. ... Irrelevant .. we are looking for shade between plant and weed
B. The shade of color of some plants tends to change appreciably over the course of their growing season. ..Irrelevant .. we are looking for shade between plant and weed
C. When crops are weeded manually, overall size and leaf shape are taken into account in distinguishing crop plants from weeds. ... Don't know what to deduce from this
D. Selection and genetic manipulation allow plants of virtually any species to be economically bred to have a distinctive shade of color without altering their other characteristics. ... Right answer.. If this were true, even if the plant and weed have same color, plant can be modified to have a different color and thus enable the use of prototype.
E. Farm laborers who are responsible for the manual weeding of crops carry out other agricultural duties at times in the growing season when extensive weeding is not necessary. ... Again. irrevelant
Next one is as follows :
A company plans to develop a prototype weeding machine that uses cutting blades with optical sensors and microprocessors that distinguish weeds from crop plants by differences in shade of color. The inventor of the machine claims that it will reduce labor costs by virtually eliminating the need for manual weeding.
Which of the following is a consideration in favor of the company’s implementing its plan to develop the prototype?
A. There is a considerable degree of variation in shade of color between weeds of different species. ... Irrelevant .. we are looking for shade between plant and weed
B. The shade of color of some plants tends to change appreciably over the course of their growing season. ..Irrelevant .. we are looking for shade between plant and weed
C. When crops are weeded manually, overall size and leaf shape are taken into account in distinguishing crop plants from weeds. ... Don't know what to deduce from this
D. Selection and genetic manipulation allow plants of virtually any species to be economically bred to have a distinctive shade of color without altering their other characteristics. ... Right answer.. If this were true, even if the plant and weed have same color, plant can be modified to have a different color and thus enable the use of prototype.
E. Farm laborers who are responsible for the manual weeding of crops carry out other agricultural duties at times in the growing season when extensive weeding is not necessary. ... Again. irrevelant
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:34 am
- Thanked: 305 times
- Followed by:55 members
- GMAT Score:760
In this case, we know that
actor = exuberant
exuberant = extroverted
Therefore
actor = extroverted
We also know that
[some] shy = actors
So therefore
[some] shy = actors = exuberant = extroverted
A) Some shy people are extroverts.
This must be true, since some shy people are actors and all actors are extroverts. Eliminate.
B) Some shy extroverts are not actors.
This could be true, but it doesn't need to be so it is the correct answer. All shy extroverts could be actors, and we could still fulfill the question that there are some shy actors.
C) Some exuberant people who are actors are shy.
This must be true. If actors = exuberant and some actors = shy, then some shy = exuberant.
D) All people who are not extroverts are not actors.
This must be true. We know that actors = extroverts (and vice versa) so if someone is NOT an extroverts, then they cannot, by definition, be an actor, since an actor must be an extrovert.
E) Some extroverts are shy.
This must be true, since some actors are shy and all actors = extroverts.
IMO the answer is B. This one feels like math...
actor = exuberant
exuberant = extroverted
Therefore
actor = extroverted
We also know that
[some] shy = actors
So therefore
[some] shy = actors = exuberant = extroverted
A) Some shy people are extroverts.
This must be true, since some shy people are actors and all actors are extroverts. Eliminate.
B) Some shy extroverts are not actors.
This could be true, but it doesn't need to be so it is the correct answer. All shy extroverts could be actors, and we could still fulfill the question that there are some shy actors.
C) Some exuberant people who are actors are shy.
This must be true. If actors = exuberant and some actors = shy, then some shy = exuberant.
D) All people who are not extroverts are not actors.
This must be true. We know that actors = extroverts (and vice versa) so if someone is NOT an extroverts, then they cannot, by definition, be an actor, since an actor must be an extrovert.
E) Some extroverts are shy.
This must be true, since some actors are shy and all actors = extroverts.
IMO the answer is B. This one feels like math...
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 6:13 pm
- gmat740
- MBA Student
- Posts: 1194
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Thanked: 71 times
- Followed by:17 members
- GMAT Score:710
Yes the answer is B
Agree with myohmy, this one was more mathematical than logical.
Here goes the next one.
Well to narrow this down.The fight is between A and B.I look forward for some good discussion with this one.
Agree with myohmy, this one was more mathematical than logical.
Here goes the next one.
Well to narrow this down.The fight is between A and B.I look forward for some good discussion with this one.
- Attachments
-
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:02 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
- Thanked: 104 times
- Followed by:1 members
would go for B.
if Erik counters Frieda's argument, he should have shown an alternate method to prevent damage from overloaded circuits since he claims overloaded circuits cause more damage than lightning does
if Erik counters Frieda's argument, he should have shown an alternate method to prevent damage from overloaded circuits since he claims overloaded circuits cause more damage than lightning does