IMO D too.. here i would like to add something about statement C..scoobydooby wrote:would go for D
A, B, E are out of scope.
C: we do not know if the mentioned mergers happened in the carpet industry, and if the same will happen to the carpet industry. the carpet industry may well be unique
D. price cutting=> other firms leave=>market share increases for the firms that go for price cutting. gives an alternate way of increasing market share. weakens the conclusion
In C, the profit has been mentioned but not the market share.. in the stimuli the issue is regarding less market share..i think stimuli never talked about the profit of the carpet industry..
Scooby, regarding the physician question, could u please tell me what is wrong with E?