Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

49 in Quant ? very doubtful .....

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: 49 in Quant ? very doubtful .....

by Pranay » Wed May 06, 2009 4:42 am
Although from Option 1, the total no. of students studying French can be deduced but the total no. of students cant be deduced which is very important conclude on the comparison. Thus, A is ruled out.

From Option 2 also the total no. of students on the institute cannot be figured out.

Thus, B is ruled out.

Since, using both also we cannot find the total no. of students, E is the correct answer.

Hope it helps .. :)
Join the discussion

by mike22629 » Wed May 06, 2009 5:14 am
I think its C.

Whats OA?
Join the discussion

by mikeCoolBoy » Wed May 06, 2009 6:25 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

by mikeCoolBoy » Wed May 06, 2009 6:40 am
uhm I think B could work

X = number of students who study French
Y = number of students who study Japanese

we know that 0.04X is the number of students who study French and Japanese
2 says that 0.1Y is the number of students who study Japanese and French so

0.04X = 0.1Y ---> X > Y
Join the discussion

by rahuljones1 » Wed May 06, 2009 9:04 am
mikeCoolBoy wrote:uhm I think B could work

X = number of students who study French
Y = number of students who study Japanese

we know that 0.04X is the number of students who study French and Japanese
2 says that 0.1Y is the number of students who study Japanese and French so

0.04X = 0.1Y ---> X > Y
Thanks Mike !! This solution is good.
But dont u think no. of both students studing both = 0.4X + SomeY ?
Join the discussion