BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

2016 OG CR 60

Expert replies
by Crystal W » Thu Jun 09, 2016 11:28 pm
Advertising by mail has become much less effective, with fewer consumers responding. Because consumers are increasingly overwhelmed by the sheer amount of junk mail they receive, most discard almost all otters without considering them. Thus. an effective way tor corporations to improve response rates would be to more carefully target the individuals to whom they mail advertising, thereby cutting down on the amount oi junk mall each consumer receives.

Which of the following, if true, would most support this recommendation?

(A) There are cost effective means by which corporations that currently advertise by mail could improve response rates.

(B) Many successful corporations are already carefully targeting the individuals to whom they mail advertising.

(C) Any consumer who, immediately alter receiving an advertisement by mail, merely glances at it is very likely to discard it.

(D) Improvements in the quality of the advertising materials used in mail that is carefully targeted to individuals can improve the response rate for such mail.

(E) Response rates to carefully targeted advertisements by mail are considerably higher, on average, than response rates to most other forms of advertising.

Can someone explain this question for ? I am so confused. I only can understand choice B is incorrect even though I choose B as the answer at the beginning. The OA is E. But I think E is not an evidence to support but it describe the information of passage again. I cannot understand the explanation of choices A, C, D, either.
Thanks in advance!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:24 am
Crystal W wrote:Advertising by mail has become much less effective, with fewer consumers responding. Because consumers are increasingly overwhelmed by the sheer amount of junk mail they receive, most discard almost all otters without considering them. Thus. an effective way tor corporations to improve response rates would be to more carefully target the individuals to whom they mail advertising, thereby cutting down on the amount oi junk mall each consumer receives.

Which of the following, if true, would most support this recommendation?

(A) There are cost effective means by which corporations that currently advertise by mail could improve response rates.

(B) Many successful corporations are already carefully targeting the individuals to whom they mail advertising.

(C) Any consumer who, immediately alter receiving an advertisement by mail, merely glances at it is very likely to discard it.

(D) Improvements in the quality of the advertising materials used in mail that is carefully targeted to individuals can improve the response rate for such mail.

(E) Response rates to carefully targeted advertisements by mail are considerably higher, on average, than response rates to most other forms of advertising.

Can someone explain this question for ? I am so confused. I only can understand choice B is incorrect even though I choose B as the answer at the beginning. The OA is E. But I think E is not an evidence to support but it describe the information of passage again. I cannot understand the explanation of choices A, C, D, either.
Thanks in advance!
Recommendation: Corporations should more carefully target the individuals to whom they mail advertising.
Goal: To improve response rates.

The correct answer must show that response rates will be improved if corporations follow the recommendation above.
Only E strengthens the link between the careful targeting of individuals and an increase in response rates:
Response rates to carefully targeted advertisements by mail are considerably higher, on average, than response rates to most other forms of advertising.

The correct answer is E.

A: There are cost effective means by which corporations that currently advertise by mail could improve response rates.
This option does not show how THE CAREFUL TARGETING OF INDIVIDUALS will improve response rates.
Eliminate A.

B: Many successful corporations are already carefully targeting the individuals to whom they mail advertising.
This CR is not about success but about RESPONSE RATES.
Since this option does not indicate whether RESPONSE RATES WILL BE IMPROVED by the careful targeting of individuals, eliminate B.

C: Any consumer who, immediately alter receiving an advertisement by mail, merely glances at it is very likely to discard it.
Since a consumer who discards an advertisement does not RESPOND to it, the conclusion that response rates will be improved is WEAKENED.
Eliminate C.

D: Improvements in the quality of the advertising materials used in mail that is carefully targeted to individuals can improve the response rate for such mail.
Here, the QUALITY OF THE MATERIALS can improve response rates.
The correct answer choice must show that the CAREFUL TARGETING OF INDIVIDUALS -- on its own -- will improve response rates.
Eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Crystal W » Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:46 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Crystal W wrote:Advertising by mail has become much less effective, with fewer consumers responding. Because consumers are increasingly overwhelmed by the sheer amount of junk mail they receive, most discard almost all otters without considering them. Thus. an effective way tor corporations to improve response rates would be to more carefully target the individuals to whom they mail advertising, thereby cutting down on the amount oi junk mall each consumer receives.

Which of the following, if true, would most support this recommendation?

(A) There are cost effective means by which corporations that currently advertise by mail could improve response rates.

(B) Many successful corporations are already carefully targeting the individuals to whom they mail advertising.

(C) Any consumer who, immediately alter receiving an advertisement by mail, merely glances at it is very likely to discard it.

(D) Improvements in the quality of the advertising materials used in mail that is carefully targeted to individuals can improve the response rate for such mail.

(E) Response rates to carefully targeted advertisements by mail are considerably higher, on average, than response rates to most other forms of advertising.

Can someone explain this question for ? I am so confused. I only can understand choice B is incorrect even though I choose B as the answer at the beginning. The OA is E. But I think E is not an evidence to support but it describe the information of passage again. I cannot understand the explanation of choices A, C, D, either.
Thanks in advance!
Recommendation: Corporations should more carefully target the individuals to whom they mail advertising.
Goal: To improve response rates.

The correct answer must show that response rates will be improved if corporations follow the recommendation above.
Only E strengthens the link between the careful targeting of individuals and an increase in response rates:
Response rates to carefully targeted advertisements by mail are considerably higher, on average, than response rates to most other forms of advertising.

The correct answer is E.

A: There are cost effective means by which corporations that currently advertise by mail could improve response rates.
This option does not show how THE CAREFUL TARGETING OF INDIVIDUALS will improve response rates.
Eliminate A.

B: Many successful corporations are already carefully targeting the individuals to whom they mail advertising.
This CR is not about success but about RESPONSE RATES.
Since this option does not indicate whether RESPONSE RATES WILL BE IMPROVED by the careful targeting of individuals, eliminate B.

C: Any consumer who, immediately alter receiving an advertisement by mail, merely glances at it is very likely to discard it.
Since a consumer who discards an advertisement does not RESPOND to it, the conclusion that response rates will be improved is WEAKENED.
Eliminate C.

D: Improvements in the quality of the advertising materials used in mail that is carefully targeted to individuals can improve the response rate for such mail.
Here, the QUALITY OF THE MATERIALS can improve response rates.
The correct answer choice must show that the CAREFUL TARGETING OF INDIVIDUALS -- on its own -- will improve response rates.
Eliminate D.
Thank you for your explanation. In the OG, the explanation of choice A is "Even if targeted advertising and every other means of improving response rates were too expensive to be cost-effective, targeted advertising could still be effective for any corporation willing to pay the expense." Can you explain more about this choice and this explanation?
Join the discussion