BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

2 weeks enough to improve Quant score ?

Expert replies
by gmatquant25 » Sat Oct 05, 2013 8:43 am
Hello every one . My quant score is stuck at 42-44 range in 4 Mocks that I took in 2 months ( 1st Gmatperp Q42/v30, yet to take the second prep test ).

Now the problem is I am not able to identify my weak section . The mistakes are not restricted to any particular section . For e.g I could answer some tough Geometry questions in one mock , and fail to answer easy geometry questions in the next mock. This happens because of various reasons - time pressure , unable to solve the question in 2 mins , forgot the concept -same happens with other sections as well .

My GMAT is exactly 3 weeks from today and I am at least targeting 49 ( 80th percentile ) . I have already solved all OG questions . I am thinking of getting new GMATPRPE exam Pack this week and sit for 2 mocks .

My question is how can I effectively study for the next 20 days for quant to hit the 49 mark . I am ready to do all the hard work that is needed . I just need some strategy . Such as - Practice/Review all the wrong questions again or do some hard problems ??

I can dedicate 4 hours each day from now untill 25th OCt . Appreciate some valuable suggestions ..

thanks !
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by WillEconomistGMAT » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:36 pm
Hi gmatquant25,

It's tough to find help when you don't know exactly what kind of help you need!

Between the time crunch and your difficulties pinpointing specific problem areas, may I recommend finding a program that will tailor itself to your specific needs? Two weeks of targeted help with the right software and some personal assistance can work wonders!

Let me know if you'd like more information!

All the best,
Will
Economist GMAT Instructor
Join the discussion

by TrueGritMick » Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:48 pm
You identified two problems - unable to identify your weak section, and how to effectively study for the next 20 days.Perhaps instead of "weak sections", think of types of mistakes.

Some weakness could be attributed to knowing the content, but it could also be the approach. Something I've done is to draw up a large 2x2 matrix, with x-axis labeled "Conceptual Mistakes" and "Careless Mistakes" under each quadrant, and y-axis labeled "PS" and "DS" next to each quadrant. After taking a practice exam and looking at the results, I would categorize my errors in this matrix, including the material section (e.g. Triangles) and root cause of the error (e.g. incorrect formula). By doing this, I not only was able to track and trend my mistakes by type of mistake (looking at the problem wrong vs not reading the question) as well as material (e.g. Geometry, or machine output rate word problems), but I identified patterns in how I made mistakes.

I would suggest a similar approach - content is one thing, but mistake patterns will get you regardless of type of problem.
Join the discussion