Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

1980 there was growing concern that the protective ozone

Expert replies
by pnk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:22 pm
LSAT

In 1980 there was growing concern that the protective ozone layer over the Antarctic might be decreasing and thereby allowing so much harmful ultraviolet radiation to reach the Earth that polar marine life would be damaged. Some government officials dismissed these concerns, since statistics indicated that global atmospheric ozone levels remained constant.
The relevance of the evidence cited by the government officials in support of their position would be most seriously undermined if it were true that
(A) most species of plant and animal life flourish in warm climates rather than in the polar regions
(B) decreases in the amount of atmospheric Ozone over the Antarctic ice cap tend to be seasonal rather than constant
(C) decreases in the amount of atmospheric ozone were of little concern before l980
(D) quantities of atmospheric ozone shifted away from the polar caps, correspondingly increasing ozone levels in other regions
(E) even where the amount of atmospheric ozone is normal, some ultraviolet light reaches the Earth’s surface


[spoiler]OA - D; How can we drop B [/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:23 pm
IMO D
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:32 pm
Hi Pnk,

The flaw in the question is that the author is speaking about "protective ozone layer over the Antarctic" and the gov officials are speaking about "global atmospheric ozone levels". We cannot compare ozone over atlantic with ozone over globe.

So the undermining statement should show some contrast in this aspect. Which is rightly done by D.

I believe statement B is a kind of supporting statement raher than undermining. it says that decrease over atlantic is seasonal.. that doesnt give any link to what the govt officials said.

Hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:38 pm
[spoiler]OA - D; How can we drop B[/spoiler]
The question asks us to find a choice that shows that the government officials' evidence is irrelevant.

Choice B speaks of "decreases" in ozone layer. But because the government officials' evidence showed that ozone was constant, choice B isn't relevant to the officials' evidence.

And because choice B is irrelevant to the officials' evidence it can't be showing that the officials' evidence is irrelevant (!)

TAKEAWAY: Read the question stem first, but don't just characterize the type. Juice the question stem for all bonus information. And if there are extra instructions, follow them religiously (there will almost always be a wrong answer waiting for someone who isn't). (If we call this question just "weaken" then choice B is more tempting. But if we ask: "Does this show that the officials' evidence is irrelevant?" choice B is less tempting.)
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion