BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

100pt score jump

Expert replies
by xcise_science » Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Hi,
(I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but let me if not)

Which 100pt score jump do you think is 'easier' to achieve:
a-going from a low/mid 500 to something in the 600 range OR
b-going from 600 to something in the 700 range?

(I say its B)

Also, in terms of the types of questions you might get if you're in the 700 range, do you think those questions require slightly different skills/approaches or way of thinking?

Because at that level, I don't think the test is really testing generic math skills anymore (which may be so if you're a low scorer). At that level, its basically how quickly can you realize/determine in a FEW steps how to solve the problem.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

Re: 100pt score jump

by beatthegmat » Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:40 pm
xcise_science wrote:Hi,
(I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but let me if not)

Which 100pt score jump do you think is 'easier' to achieve:
a-going from a low/mid 500 to something in the 600 range OR
b-going from 600 to something in the 700 range?

(I say its B)

Also, in terms of the types of questions you might get if you're in the 700 range, do you think those questions require slightly different skills/approaches or way of thinking?

Because at that level, I don't think the test is really testing generic math skills anymore (which may be so if you're a low scorer). At that level, its basically how quickly can you realize/determine in a FEW steps how to solve the problem.
Personally I think it's easier to jump from 500 to 600--the difficulty level of questions is easier than what you would find in the 600-700 range. Also, in the 600-700 range, the questions tend to feature more traps.

Can you explain your theory some more as to why you think the 600-700 jump is easier?
Beat The GMAT | The MBA Social Network
Community Management Team

Research Top GMAT Prep Courses:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-courses

Research The World's Top MBA Programs:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/school
Join the discussion

by xcise_science » Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:20 am
'cuse me, I meant to say the 500-600 jump is easier.

And I agree with kbot, at the high 600-700 level, pacing is definitely more crucial as well as having a solid grasp of the material. At that level, the questions might even be worded differently.

That is my main problem. I don't understand the questions well enough to consistently get me to the that 700 level.

Another interesting point: I took the test with little studying earlier this year and scored in the 92nd percentile on my verbal (I knew the quant would be a disaster and I wasn't surprised).
NOW, however I'm no where near the 90th on my verbal! I don't know what happened. My theory is that before, I think I relied more on what made sense (CR) or sounded right (SC) and the RC was relatively easy because I just liked reading.
But now, I think I'm just soo overwhelmed at all the things I have to memorize (i.e: idioms, figuring out assumption/inference, verb-agreement, etc..) that I'm thinking too much about the verbal questions.

How should I address this? I need to push my verbal back to the top considering the verbal score actually carries more weight towards your overall score (or so I've heard).

Thanks
Join the discussion

by mayonnai5e » Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:49 pm
When in doubt, go with your gut. This especially if you are a native english speaker, which it sounds like you are. You can learn all the techniques and strategies, but spending too much time applying what you've learned can sometimes bring your score down because you can end up in a place where you try to apply everything you've learned to determine which of two choices is the correct answer. The problem is that this often is very time consuming.

Thinking too much = thinking too long.

Be wary.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/my-blog-erro ... t4899.html
550 =\ ...560 =\... 650 =) ...570 =( ...540 =*( ...680 =P ... 670 =T ...=T... 650 =T ...700 =) ..690 =) ...710 =D ...GMAT 720 DING!! ;D

Learn more about me
Join the discussion