BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000SC Question No 309

Expert replies
by samyak » Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:18 am
309. For some birds the sense of smell appears to play a role in navigation, since pigeons with surgically removed olfactory nerves were found to have increased difficulties in homing.
(A) were found to have increased difficulties
(B) have been found to have increased difficulty
(C) were found to have increasing difficulty
(D) had been found to have increased difficulties
(E) have been found to have increasing difficulties

Why B is a better choice than C?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by akhpad » Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:37 am
"Since" signals me to use perfect or perfect continuous tense.

Here, past perfect does not fit.

So. B seems to be better
Join the discussion

by grockit_andrea » Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:09 am
Present perfect is the better tense here, because it implies that research is still ongoing, which makes sense in the context of what appears to be a scientific phenomenon that hasn't been fully explained. The word "since" here should not be considered an indicator of tense, though, because while it CAN refer to a time-frame, here it is instead used to mean "because." Both of those meanings are correct: https://dictionary.reference.com/browse/since. It's just a matter of determining how the word is being used in a particular sentence, which has a lot to do with where it's placed; here it is introducing evidence. Regardless, though, present perfect tense is a better choice than past.

There is a bigger issue, though, and that's increased/increasing. "Increasing" isn't a good choice here, because it indicates that the difficulty continues to increase, which we have no reason to believe is true. "Increased" is correct in this context, because it has the more commonly-used adverb implication that the difficulty is greater than normal, but not necessarily continually increasing.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:19 am
Which is more correct here:
Difficulties or Difficulty?????
Join the discussion

by abhisheksamantasenior » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:24 am
grockit_andrea wrote:Present perfect is the better tense here, because it implies that research is still ongoing, which makes sense in the context of what appears to be a scientific phenomenon that hasn't been fully explained. The word "since" here should not be considered an indicator of tense, though, because while it CAN refer to a time-frame, here it is instead used to mean "because." Both of those meanings are correct: https://dictionary.reference.com/browse/since. It's just a matter of determining how the word is being used in a particular sentence, which has a lot to do with where it's placed; here it is introducing evidence. Regardless, though, present perfect tense is a better choice than past.

There is a bigger issue, though, and that's increased/increasing. "Increasing" isn't a good choice here, because it indicates that the difficulty continues to increase, which we have no reason to believe is true. "Increased" is correct in this context, because it has the more commonly-used adverb implication that the difficulty is greater than normal, but not necessarily continually increasing.
Hi Andrea,

I have a question regarding the usage of increasing vs. increased.
I feel it should be 'to have increasing difficulty' in stead of 'to have increased difficulty'. 'to have increased' indicates that birds ,on their own, increased the difficulty, whereas 'increasing difficulty' indicates that the dfficulty was increasing, without the birds' having any control it.
Let us consider the example: He was thought to have built the house. So here the those birds did not increase their difficulty but the difficulty increased.
Am I missing sometihng here?

Regards,

Abhishek
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:39 pm
For some birds the sense of smell appears to play a role in navigation, since pigeons with surgically removed olfactory nerves were found to have increased difficulties in homing.

Hi Abhishek,

Great question!!

Your doubt brings to surface a very interesting aspect of usage of "have". The word "has/have" can be used in two different roles:

1: As a complete verb meaning "possess". - Children have many toys. Here "have" = "possess"
2: As a helping verb to form perfect tense with the main verb. - Children have played with their toys. Here "have" is used to form perfect tense with the main verb - played.

I will re-write the above two sentences in the same form as used in the sentence in question:

Children are known to have many toys (have = possess)
Children are known to have played with many toys (have = to form perfect tense)

From the above two sentences, the role played by have is very clear. There is no doubt in mind. Thus, we can determine the role of "has/have" from the meaning of the sentence.

So now lets understand the meaning of the original sentence to determine the role that "have" plays.

For some birds the sense of smell appears to play a role in navigation, since pigeons with surgically removed olfactory nerves were found to have increased difficulties in homing.

In this sentence, the author states a fact that for some birds sense of smell is used to play a role in navigation. He supports this fact by stating an observation of pigeons who did not have a sense of smell. These pigeons faced increased difficulties in homing.

Thus, in the context of this sentence - "have" = possess.
And as you yourself notes, in the context of this sentence, it does not make sense to say that pigeons themselves increased the difficulties in homing.

Thus, as you can see, "have" plays one of the two roles in this construction. If however, we use the expression "increasing difficulty", then it will change the intended meaning since as noted in the previous post, it will imply that difficulty is still increasing.

I hope this helps address your concern.

Regards,

Payal
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1