BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Tough SC question2

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:42 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

Tough SC question2

by kashefian » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:14 pm
In a controversial decision, the effects of which still reverberate today, the
Supreme Court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the
same rights as does an individual and enabled them to donate money to
politicians.
A. and enabled them to donate money to politicians
B. and enabling them to donate money to politicians
C. and enabling it to donate money to politicians
D. and enabled it to donate money to politicians
E. and is able to donate money to politicians
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:41 pm
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by sanabk » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:35 pm
C
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:22 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:700

by capnx » Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:09 pm
what's the OA?

I'd pick D
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:19 pm
I'll pick E.

a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and is able to donate money to politicians.

All the other choices are nonsensical and missing an agent of verb.
Yep.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:25 pm
IMO E

C and D are seem to be parallel to 'decided'. If it is so then meaning is getting changed. Therefore, E is correct.
kashefian wrote:In a controversial decision, the effects of which still reverberate today, the
Supreme Court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the
same rights as does an individual and enabled them to donate money to
politicians.
A. and enabled them to donate money to politicians
B. and enabling them to donate money to politicians
C. and enabling it to donate money to politicians
D. and enabled it to donate money to politicians
E. and is able to donate money to politicians
Last edited by reply2spg on Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:36 pm
IMO E
--------
Ankur mittal
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by karanrulz4ever » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:24 pm
IMO E
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:6 members

by niksworth » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:36 am
uwhusky wrote:I'll pick E.

a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and is able to donate money to politicians.

All the other choices are nonsensical and missing an agent of verb.
Isn't E nonsensical itself?

In certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and is able to donate money to politicians.

In certain respects, a corporation is able to donate money to politicians - What does it even mean? Ugly.

I suspect D might be right.

The Supreme Court
- decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual
and
- enabled it to donate money to politicians.

This makes better sense. Not a stellar question though.
scio me nihil scire
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
Thanked: 74 times
Followed by:4 members

by uwhusky » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:54 am
The way the sentence is structured, I thought that a corporation had to be the subject of the clause.

Perhaps the meaning might be little off, but I just can't see any other choice being correct grammar wise.

I'll just settle with this question being less than stellar.
Yep.
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:55 am
Location: Baku, Azerbaijan

by bakhshaliyev » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:06 am
An inventory equal to 90 days sales is as much as even the strongest businesses carry, and then only as a way to anticipate higher prices or ensure against shortages.

a.
b. ....
c. so much as even

I could not decide which to choose a. or c. i have chosen c but the correct answer is a. can somebody explain me plz why a. is the correct answer?
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:15 am
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:3 members

by clock60 » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:16 am
vote for D,
while E does not contain any grammer mistakes, it does not convey the intended meaning,
the raeasons are the the same as mentioned by nicksworth
the court decided ..... and ennabled..
the company is able to donate without permissions, but it can be forbid to do so.
Top
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:42 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by kashefian » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:37 pm
I suspect D might be right.

The Supreme Court
- decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual
and
- enabled it to donate money to politicians.

This makes better sense. Not a stellar question though.
Totally agreed. Choice E does not make sense. However, the answers stated in book "Conquering GMAT verbal and writing" states the following:

Answer E. The "corporation" is a singular noun, so "them" does not
agree. Choices A and Choice B are incorrect. For parallelism purposes,
choice E is best because the clause reads "the corporation
has...and is..." The other choices use the wrong verb form.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:24 am
Followed by:1 members

by Ramneet Singh » Fri Oct 08, 2010 2:01 am
kashefian wrote:In a controversial decision, the effects of which still reverberate today, the
Supreme Court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the
same rights as does an individual and enabled them to donate money to
politicians.
A. and enabled them to donate money to politicians
B. and enabling them to donate money to politicians
C. and enabling it to donate money to politicians
D. and enabled it to donate money to politicians
E. and is able to donate money to politicians
From what i gathered from the following url, it is not the court which enables an entity to do something but the laws that the court pass or the judgement or the provisions that enable.
however i am still not sure 100% sure.
https://examples.yourdictionary.com/enable
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:15 am
Location: 127.0.0.1
Thanked: 15 times

by gmatrix » Fri Oct 08, 2010 2:53 am
my pick E

read it as:

a corporation has the same rights as does an individual and

a corporation .... is able to donate money to politicians

is correctly denotes the singular noun-corporation
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:54 am
Location: New York City
Thanked: 2 times

by bdevas01 » Fri Oct 08, 2010 4:54 am
The answer is E

The is a parallelism question:

The supreme court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation has the same rights as does an individual.

AND

The supreme court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation is able to donate money to politicians.

_____________________________________

WRONG:

The supreme court decided that in certain legal respects, a corporation enabled/enables to donate money to politicians.
Top
Post new topic Locked