BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000SC # 22

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Tue Nov 04, 2008 8:28 pm
A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago

(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

----------------------------------
It's obvious that the idiom "as many as" should be used, which leaves me with choice (C), or (E)
Then (E) is incorrect, it does not conform to standard comparison
but I don't think (C) is correct. At the end, why "there were", not "there was"????
I guess "one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils" is an ambiguous phrase here
Would anyone help me explain this question
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: 1000SC # 22

by logitech » Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:19 pm
[email protected] wrote:A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago

(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were
(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

----------------------------------
It's obvious that the idiom "as many as" should be used, which leaves me with choice (C), or (E)
Then (E) is incorrect, it does not conform to standard comparison
but I don't think (C) is correct. At the end, why "there were", not "there was"????
I guess "one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils" is an ambiguous phrase here
Would anyone help me explain this question
one computer for every 32...
two computers for every 64
four computers for every 128

I think the comparison is between the number of computers..not computer per pupil.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:05 am
a question guys,,,,


four times as many as there were..

here "four times" modifies microcomputer...


my question is :

do we have to consider " four times" that refers to microcomputer , as plural.....??
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:13 am
raunekk wrote: do we have to consider " four times" that refers to microcomputer , as plural.....??
It doesnt refer to computers, four times refers to figure/data.

A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago

(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were - Correct
(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were - Changes the meaning
(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as - Changes the meaning
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:01 am
@4meonly

thanks a lot man...

But my question is "four times" ( figure/date) is taken as plural...

or for that matter,,,,

two times, three times.... and so on.. all are plural???

or it depends on the context/subject??

for e.g:

Is Esperanto at least four times easier to learn?

thanks
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:18 am
raunekk wrote:@4meonly

thanks a lot man...

But my question is "four times" ( figure/date) is taken as plural...

or for that matter,,,,

two times, three times.... and so on.. all are plural???

or it depends on the context/subject??

for e.g:

Is Esperanto at least four times easier to learn?

thanks
Here "is" is because of Esperanto.

but yes was / were issue in Qn is confusing.

there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were four years ago.

What does second there refers to?
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:29 am
4meonly wrote:
raunekk wrote: do we have to consider " four times" that refers to microcomputer , as plural.....??
It doesnt refer to computers, four times refers to figure/data.

A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago

(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were - Correct
(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were - Changes the meaning
(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as - Changes the meaning
------------------------------------
I'm not satisfied with your explantion. if now the fraction is "one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils", 4 years ago, the figure was 1/4 of what is now, which means "1/4 microcomputer for every 32 pupils", or " 1 computer for every (32x4 ) 128 pupils. Still single, not plural, right?
Join the discussion

by sam98034 » Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:34 am
there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were four years ago.

there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many [microcomputers] as there were four years ago.

"Microcomputers" is implied...otherwise, four times as many what?

and does "four times as many [microcomputer] as there is four years ago" sound right to you?
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 06, 2008 7:51 am
sam98034 wrote:there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were four years ago.

there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many [microcomputers] as there were four years ago.

"Microcomputers" is implied...otherwise, four times as many what?

and does "four times as many [microcomputer] as there is four years ago" sound right to you?
Sounds perfect. Thank you!
Join the discussion

explanation for "there"

by ashish1354 » Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:10 am
In OG a specific reference suggests that "there" must be used only to refer to some physical location and not other wise. So, i chose E) although it somewhat alters the meaning.

Please help!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1