BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000CR Question No 2 : Test 14

Expert replies
by samyak » Mon May 10, 2010 12:21 pm
2. Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable employees, free of charge, to improve their physical fitness, reduce stress, and learn ways to stop smoking. These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care. Therefore, these programs benefit the company as well as the employee.
Which of the following, if true, most significantly strengthens the conclusion above?
(A) Physical fitness programs are often the most popular services offered to employees.
(B) Studies have shown that training in stress management is not effective for many people.
(C) Regular exercise reduces people's risk of heart disease and provides them with increased energy.
(D) Physical injuries sometimes result from entering a strenuous physical fitness program too quickly.
(E) Employee assistance programs require companies to hire people to supervise the various programs offered.

Why C is a better answer than A? Please comment.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by iamseer » Mon May 10, 2010 12:38 pm
the arguments speaks of all benefits (increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care) as far as the company is concerned and at the end jumps to conclude that these programs benefit both the company and the employees.

If we have to strengthen this argument we need some evidence that employees also benefit from these programs.

C does exactly that.

E- if at all, it weakens the argument
D - if at all, it weakens the argument
B - again it weakens the argument
A - irrelevant - it does not strengthen or weaken the conclusion "these programs benefit the company as well as the employee. "

HTH!!
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"
Join the discussion

by agganitk » Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:52 am
I also think that A should be the answer. What if employees are not attending the program. In this case, Choice A is confirming that program is popular, indicating that employees are attending the program. As far as option C is concerned, what if medication is done in the program for aforesaid benefits, and this makes option C irrelavent.
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:46 pm
Option A says that Physical fitness programs are often the most popular services offered to employees.

Popular does not mean that they are beneficial to both the parties. What is the program is popular but not attended by employees. Then, in that case there is no benefit to any of the involved parties..
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:33 pm
As per power score bible find out the conclusion and then whether argument is strong or weak. Conclusion is in blue. This argument is obviously weak, why? If program is helping employees then how it is beneficial to company. Option which gives us this answer is the strengthening answer. Let's analyze all options.
samyak wrote:2. Many companies now have employee assistance programs that enable employees, free of charge, to improve their physical fitness, reduce stress, and learn ways to stop smoking. These programs increase worker productivity, reduce absenteeism, and lessen insurance costs for employee health care. Therefore, these programs benefit the company as well as the employee.

Which of the following, if true, most significantly strengthens the conclusion above?

(A) Physical fitness programs are often the most popular services offered to employees. -- Incorrect - this is just a statement which doesn't has any effect on the conclusion. Ok these programs are often the most popular services offered to employees, but how employees are using these services? no information. After using the service how many employees are getting benefited? No Information.
(B) Studies have shown that training in stress management is not effective for many people. - Incorrect - This actually weakens the argument. If the training is not effective then it is not beneficial for company.
(C) Regular exercise reduces people's risk of heart disease and provides them with increased energy. - Correct - If program increases the energy of the employees then it will be obviously beneficial for the company.
(D) Physical injuries sometimes result from entering a strenuous physical fitness program too quickly. - Incorrect - This actually weakens the argument. If injuries are resulting from entering a strenuous physical fitness program then it is not beneficial for company.
(E) Employee assistance programs require companies to hire people to supervise the various programs offered. - Incorrect - this also weakens the conclusion. If company has to hire more people then company's cost of operation will increase and program will not be beneficial

Why C is a better answer than A? Please comment.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion