BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000CR Question No 10 : LSATII

Expert replies
by samyak » Thu May 13, 2010 9:46 am
10. Even if a crime that has been committed by computer is discovered and reported, the odds of being both arrested and convicted greatly favor the criminal.
Each of the following, if true, supports the claim above EXCEPT:
(A) The preparation of computer-fraud cases takes much more time than is required for average fraud cases, and the productivity of prosecutors is evaluated by the number of good cases made.
(B) In most police departments, officers are rotated through different assignments every two or three years, a shorter time than it takes to become proficient as a computer-crime investigator.
(C) The priorities of local police departments, under whose jurisdiction most computer crime falls, are weighted toward visible street crime that communities perceive as threatening.
(D) Computer criminals have rarely been sentenced to serve time in prison, because prisons are overcrowded with violent criminals and drug offenders.
(E) The many police officers who are untrained in computers often inadvertently destroy the physical evidence of computer crime.

Please answer this question. Please give your reasoning as well.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thephoenix » Thu May 13, 2010 9:59 am
IMO A
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion

by samyak » Thu May 13, 2010 10:39 am
OA ia D. Please explain your reasoning as well.
Join the discussion

by jeffedwards » Thu May 13, 2010 10:40 am
IMO D

Claim: odds of being both arrested and convicted greatly favor the criminal

D - Computer criminals have rarely been sentenced to serve time in prison, because prisons are overcrowded with violent criminals and drug offenders.

D does not support the claim, because this says nothing about the being arrested or convicted...where a criminal goes is after the arrest and conviction (found guilty)

Everything else appears to support the claim.
Join the discussion

by sk818020 » Thu May 13, 2010 11:01 am
Not (A), because if prosecuters are judged by how many good cases thet propose, then there would be an incentive not go after computer fraud cases because they take so long to propose a good case. This would support the claim.

Not (B) because police not having proficiency at computer crime investegation means they are more apt to not catch computer criminals. This supports the claim.

Not (C) beacuse if priorities of police are to catch street criminals, they are not likely to go after computer criminals until all the street criminals are gone. This supports the claim.

(D) is correct because not serving time in prison doesn't say anything about the odds of being both arrested and convicted. The stimulus does not say that its not possible to be arrested, convicted and not go to prison.

Not (E) because if police are destroying the evidence then this decreases the odds of a conviction. This supports the claim.

Hope this helps.


Thanks,

Jared
Join the discussion