BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 SC Q #50

Expert replies
by punit.kaur.mba » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:31 am
Qn: 50

According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.

(A) so that it was the lowest in two years

(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate

(C) to what would be the lowest in two years

(D) to a two-year low level(E)

(E) to the lowest level in two years

OA is E

Whats wrong with D? Please explain the difference between D and E
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by anwarma » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:50 pm
I think the lowest level in two years is the correct form.
AA
Join the discussion

by punit.kaur.mba » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:52 pm
Whats wrong with D? Is it grammatically wrong? I thought it was clear and concise.
Join the discussion

by anwarma » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:03 pm
lowest level in two years - clearly refers to unemployment where as to a two-year low level does not tie it to unemployment if you read the whole sentence.
AA
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:40 pm
B T W I find this very awkward

the July decrease in unemployment ??

Does any one find it wrong/awkward?
Join the discussion

by senthil » Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:26 pm
Could somebody ecplain why E is correct and not D !!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by nil4700 » Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:35 pm
Even i want to know why option D is wrong. The only reason i could guess is that the word LOWEST is more meaningful. I'm not sure with this and i opted for D initially.

Someone please explain why D is wrong.
Join the discussion

by loki.gmat » Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:37 pm
i think the answer to this question depends on the intended meaning of the sentence by the author. the author wants to suggest that the job market is in a continuous improvement phase ("gradual improvement in the job market is continuing"). the author compares this gradual improvement with the continous decrease in the unemployment rate in the last 2yrs.

E scores over D bcoz E says that the unemployment has decreased to its lowest level in past 2 yrs i.e, there is a declining trend going on which indicates a continuing improvement in the job market.

hence IMO E.

hope this helps.


Thanks!
Join the discussion

by Buzz » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:31 pm
Can somebody explain why C is incorrect.
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:28 pm
Buzz wrote:Can somebody explain why C is incorrect.
decrease in unemployement so that it was the lowest
is incorrect.
decrease so that is making it incorrect.

July decrease suggests
means the decrease has already happended
so saying what would be lowest in incorrect
so C is also out


D:
decrease to a two year low level
this incorrectly means... to a two year old level which was low

we want to point to the lowest level of two years
it can be anywhere during last 2 years....

Hope it helps.....
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1