BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 SC 321

Expert replies
by iwill » Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:34 am
From the bark of the paper birch tree the Menomini crafted a canoe about twenty feet long and two feet wide, with small ribs and rails of cedar, which could carry four persons or eight hundred pounds of baggage so light that a person could easily portage it around impeding rapids.

(A) baggage so light
(B) baggage being so light
(C) baggage, yet being so light
(D) baggage, and so light
(E) baggage yet was so light

Official Answer: E

Thanks,Iwill.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: 1000 SC 321

by codesnooker » Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:14 am
iwill wrote:From the bark of the paper birch tree the Menomini crafted a canoe about twenty feet long and two feet wide, with small ribs and rails of cedar, which could carry four persons or eight hundred pounds of baggage so light that a person could easily portage it around impeding rapids.

(A) baggage so light
(B) baggage being so light
(C) baggage, yet being so light
(D) baggage, and so light
(E) baggage yet was so light

Official Answer: E

Thanks,Iwill.
This is simple too. You need to show the contrast that though cedar pick so heavy weight but still is so light to...

This rules out choices (A), (B) and (D).

Between choices (C) and (E), (C) uses word being, which is wordy and makes sentence usually (99%) awkward. Hence choose (E).
Join the discussion

by pepeprepa » Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:38 am
I don't understand why you can't chose D) for example
Join the discussion

by codesnooker » Sun Aug 24, 2008 11:13 am
pepeprepa wrote:I don't understand why you can't chose D) for example
You need contrast in the sentence that is absent in (D). Therefore, we can't choose (D).

Check the sentence again:

which could carry four persons or eight hundred pounds of baggage so light that a person could easily portage it around impeding rapids.

You can ignore the initial part of the sentence, it is waste for us. Check the remaining part that I have marked bold above. The sentence is taking about something that is capable of lifting heavy weight but still feel light that makes transportation easier.

Check the contrast mark above with in the underlined portion. The same thing you need to show in the given sentence.

Hope this helps...
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:23 am
In this question, option E, don't we need comma after baggage ?
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:51 am
madhur_ahuja wrote:In this question, option E, don't we need comma after baggage ?
IMO No....because.....if we shall put the comma...then yet thing will become part of main clause....

but we need to put the same in the which clause only to show the contrast...

which could carry XYZ....yet was so light...
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:56 am
Received a PM asking me to respond on the correct answer (E) and why it's okay to have "yet without a comma."

"Yet" is what's called a coordinating conjunction, so it can be used to connect two independent clauses (or full sentences). When you use it for this purpose, you do need to use a comma. But - this is not the only way to use the word "yet" in a sentence.

So if I wanted to say:

"I want to the store to buy some milk. They were all out."

I could say:
"I went to the store to buy some milk, yet they were all out."

Now check out the above problem. Does E follow that same pattern - the sentence before "yet" is a complete sentence and the stuff after "yet" is a complete sentence?

Nope. "was so light that a person could..." isn't a complete sentence. So "yet" isn't being used to connect two complete sentences in this circumstance. Comma not required.

I don't really like this question overall for other reasons though. I personally wouldn't study this one. :)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:14 pm
Stacey Koprince wrote:I don't really like this question overall for other reasons though. I personally wouldn't study this one. :)
Hi Stacey,

This is OG-10, Q114. So no option but to study and understand :-)
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Jul 15, 2009 1:18 pm
Still don't like it. :)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by pjain01 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:49 am
Hi Stacy,
why the option D is wrong?
Can't we use 'And' for showing the contrast between two things.

Regards,
Parveen
Join the discussion

by Stacey Koprince » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:46 am
This book is no longer published, so I will discuss it briefly - it's kind of in a grey zone as far as copyright is concerned.

There are two problems with D. First, "and" does not show a contrast between two things, no. "And" is either neutral or indicates that the two things go together in some way.

Second, the biggest thing "and" indicates is parallelism, and D isn't parallel. A similarly-constructed sentence:

<The Menomini crafted a canoe> <about 20 ft long and 2 ft wide>, <with S>, <which could carry A or B>, and <so light that Y>.

The "and" at the end indicates parallelism ("and" always indicates some form of parallelism). The stuff after the "and" is one of the two items that need to be made parallel. What's the other? There are potentially two different ways to interpret this (and both are wrong):

<The M crafted a canoe> <about 20 ft long AND 2 ft wide AND so light that Y>. In this example, the "so light that Y" part is parallel to the other prepositional phrase descriptor that comes after "canoe." One problem with this is that the double "and" construction is awkward. The other problem is that the meaning of the sentence is now changed / obscured. The point is to make a contrast between how much weight it can carry and how light it is. We've lost that meaning.

<The M crafted a canoe> <about 20 ft long and 2 ft wide>, <with S>, <which> <could carry A or B>, AND <so light that Y>. In this example, the two items after "which" are parallel, and both apply to the "which." So we have "which could carry A or B, and (which) so light that Y." In the first item, "which" is followed by a verb. In the second, it isn't. Not parallel.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:05 am
Stacey Koprince wrote:This book is no longer published, so I will discuss it briefly - it's kind of in a grey zone as far as copyright is concerned.

There are two problems with D. First, "and" does not show a contrast between two things, no. "And" is either neutral or indicates that the two things go together in some way.

Second, the biggest thing "and" indicates is parallelism, and D isn't parallel. A similarly-constructed sentence:

<The Menomini crafted a canoe> <about 20 ft long and 2 ft wide>, <with S>, <which could carry A or B>, and <so light that Y>.

The "and" at the end indicates parallelism ("and" always indicates some form of parallelism). The stuff after the "and" is one of the two items that need to be made parallel. What's the other? There are potentially two different ways to interpret this (and both are wrong):

<The M crafted a canoe> <about 20 ft long AND 2 ft wide AND so light that Y>. In this example, the "so light that Y" part is parallel to the other prepositional phrase descriptor that comes after "canoe." One problem with this is that the double "and" construction is awkward. The other problem is that the meaning of the sentence is now changed / obscured. The point is to make a contrast between how much weight it can carry and how light it is. We've lost that meaning.

<The M crafted a canoe> <about 20 ft long and 2 ft wide>, <with S>, <which> <could carry A or B>, AND <so light that Y>. In this example, the two items after "which" are parallel, and both apply to the "which." So we have "which could carry A or B, and (which) so light that Y." In the first item, "which" is followed by a verb. In the second, it isn't. Not parallel.
This is awesome explanation!!! The explanation could be used to crack many tough questions.
Thanks.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1