1000 CRs - Comedians

Expert replies

kajcha: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 321; Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:42 am; Thanked: 1 times

by kajcha » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:45 am

All of the best comedians have had unhappy childhoods. Yet, many people who have had happy childhoods are good comedians, and some good comedians who have had miserably unhappy childhoods are happy adults.
If the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?
(A) The proportion of good comedians who had unhappy childhoods is greater than the proportion of the best comedians who did.
(B) Some good comedians have had unhappy childhoods and are unhappy adults.
(C) Most of the best comedians are happy adults.
(D) More good comedians have had unhappy childhoods than have had happy childhoods.
(E) The proportion of comedians who are happy adults is higher than the proportion who are unhappy adults.

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:45 am

mschling52: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 105; Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 12:34 pm; Location: OH; Thanked: 7 times; GMAT Score:780

by mschling52 » Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:11 am

I think it's A.

The passage states that ALL of the best comedians had unhappy childhoods and that SOME good comedians had happy childhoods.

Since the proportion of the best comedians who had unhappy childhoods is 100%, it is not possible for the proportion of good comedians with unhappy childhoods to be any higher.

kajcha: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 321; Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:42 am; Thanked: 1 times

by kajcha » Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:30 am

Yeah, that's the one OA is A

sibbineni: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 222; Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:10 pm; Thanked: 15 times

by sibbineni » Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:22 am

IMO (A)

premise 1: All of the best comedians have had unhappy childhoods.
100% of the best comedians have unhappy childhoods.
Premise 2: Some of the good comedians have had miserably unhappy childhoods
Not 100% of the good comedians have unhappy childhoods

so the proportion of best comedians who had unhappy child hoods is > than good comedians

simplyjat: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 423; Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:29 amFollowed by: 2 members; Location: Hyderabad, India; Thanked: 36 times; GMAT Score:770

by simplyjat » Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:54 pm

Are these type questions asked in GMAT? I am having a belief that these questions are out of scope for GMAT...

simplyjat

Stuart@KaplanGMAT: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 3224; Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pmFollowed by: 614 members; Location: Toronto; Thanked: 1710 times; GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:52 am

sibbineni wrote:IMO (A)

premise 1: All of the best comedians have had unhappy childhoods.
100% of the best comedians have unhappy childhoods.
Premise 2: Some of the good comedians have had miserably unhappy childhoods
Not 100% of the good comedians have unhappy childhoods

so the proportion of best comedians who had unhappy child hoods is > than good comedians

(A) is correct, but one small mistake in this reasoning.

"Some" literally means "at least one" and has no upper limit.

So, "some of the good comedians have had miserably unhappy childhoods" means that "at least one good comedian has had a miserably unhappy childhood". It's actually possible that ALL of them were miserably unhappy.

So, as Mschling pointed out, since 100% of the best were unhappy, it's impossible that a GREATER proportion of the good were unhappy, since there's no proportion greater than 100%.

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

khanshainur: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 300; Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Tue May 10, 2016 1:44 am

i totally agree with you, guys. It's A

Featured schoolRound 2 closes Jan 7, 2027 62 days left

Chicago Booth

Since 1982, 10 Booth faculty members have received the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, more than any other business school.

#3
U.S. News rank: $175,000
Median base salary: 670
Average GMAT Focus: 635
Students in the class

Apply to Booth Visit chicagobooth.edu See the full profile

Photo: Warren LeMay, CC BY-SA 2.0

GMAT Course Reviews

563 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (563 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review