BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 CR(test iii question 1)

Expert replies
by arghya05 » Mon May 11, 2009 11:08 am
Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous cells. One group’s cages were rotated in a disorienting manner. Two-thirds of these mice developed cancers. One-tenth of the mice in stationary cages developed cancers. The researchers concluded that stress enhances the development of cancer in laboratory mice.
The researchers’ conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Rotating the cages in disorienting manner produced stress in the mice in those cages.
(B) The injections given to the two groups of mice were not of equal strength.
(C) Injecting the mice with cancerous cells caused stress in the mice.
(D) Even without the injections the mice in the rotated cages would have developed cancers.
(E) Even the rotation of cages in a manner that is not disorienting is likely to produce stress in mice in those cages.


i found the answer to be B but i can someone explain me the logic?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
i like A

premise: injection+disorienting rotation causes more cancer than injection+no rotation.

conclusion: stress=>enhances developement of cancer

A. correct, IMO. negate: if disorienting rotation produces no stress, then development of cancer cannot be enhanced in the rotated cage-argument falls apart.

B. negate: if injections were of equal strength, it singles out disoriented rotation as cause of enhancement of cancer. supports the argument. eliminate

C. if injections caused stress, then there would have been equal developemt of cancer in both cages. eliminate

D. says injection does not cause cancer. irrelevant as it doesnt talk about stress and doesnt affect the conclusion

E. non-disorienting rotation is out of scope.
Join the discussion

by rs2010 » Mon May 11, 2009 4:53 pm
Answer should be A.
Join the discussion

Re: 1000 CR(test iii question 1)

by rahulg83 » Tue May 12, 2009 9:33 pm
arghya05 wrote:Two groups of laboratory mice were injected with cancerous cells. One group’s cages were rotated in a disorienting manner. Two-thirds of these mice developed cancers. One-tenth of the mice in stationary cages developed cancers. The researchers concluded that stress enhances the development of cancer in laboratory mice.
The researchers’ conclusion logically depends on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Rotating the cages in disorienting manner produced stress in the mice in those cages.
(B) The injections given to the two groups of mice were not of equal strength.
(C) Injecting the mice with cancerous cells caused stress in the mice.
(D) Even without the injections the mice in the rotated cages would have developed cancers.
(E) Even the rotation of cages in a manner that is not disorienting is likely to produce stress in mice in those cages.


i found the answer to be B but i can someone explain me the logic?

This question is too much vague. Two groups (were they of equal strength?) were injected with cancer cells. If we assume that two groups were of equal strength and cancer cell injections are also of equal numbers (which opposes choice "B"), then only possibility that causes stress in mice is disoriented rotation of cage ( choice "A").
I second all of you above, A should be the answer
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Sun May 15, 2016 1:20 pm
I am leaning more towards A, but I'm not sure about it.
Join the discussion