BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 CR test 5

Expert replies
by magical cook » Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:54 pm
Hi,

The correct answer is A) but it looks to me A) is equivalent to B)... That is, if A) is correct, B) seems correct too. Can anyone explain the difference?


Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the greatest increase in the number of people employed will be in the category of low-paying service occupations. This category, however, will not increase its share of total employment, whereas the category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.

If the estimates above are accurate, which of the following conclusions can be drawn?
(A) In 1982 more people were working in low-paying service occupations than were working in high-paying service occupations.
(B) In 1995 more people will be working in high-paying service occupations than will be working in low-paying service occupations.
(C) Nonservice occupations will account for the same share of total employment in 1995 as in 1982.
(D) Many of the people who were working in low-paying service occupations in 1982 will be working in high-paying service occupations by 1995.
(E) The rate of growth for low-paying service occupations will be greater than the overall rate of employment growth between 1982 and 1995.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rajesh_ctm » Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:53 pm
A and B are not related. Consider the following scenario:
1982 - Total jobs 100 - Low paying - 80, High Paying - 20
1995 - Total jobs 200 - Low paying - 150, High Paying - 50

Increase in Low Paying - 70.
Increase in High Paying - 30.

A is valid, but B is not.
Join the discussion

by magical cook » Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:48 pm
Okay - I now understand the logic. Thanks for great explanation:)
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:29 am
opening this thread again..
Suggestions guys..
I am not convinced with the answer, and i went for D..
Join the discussion

by yogami » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:42 pm
Lets not post the answer first even before we read the question. At least hide the answer with black!
200 or 800. It don't matter no more.
Join the discussion

by Robinmrtha » Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:45 pm
Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the greatest increase in the number of people employed will be in the category of low-paying service occupations. This category, however, will not increase its share of total employment, whereas the category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.

increase in the number of low-paying service occupation...
but the share will remain the same....
So even when the number of people who work in low paying service occupation increases....the share will be same....
i.e if its 10 percent in 1982 then its the same in 1995
again
so suppose high paying service occupations increase its share then it doesnt necessarily mean that more people will be working in high-paying service occupations than will be working in low-paying service occupations.

So A is correct...[/quote]
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:40 am
tricky one.. didn,t get it right for the first time..
A it is.. nice question..
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:27 am
yogami wrote:Lets not post the answer first even before we read the question. At least hide the answer with black!
Strongly agree with this.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:09 am
experts,

help needed here.

I went with [spoiler](D)[/spoiler]. is the OA right here? if yes, please help me understand.

jai hind.
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Sun May 15, 2016 11:49 pm
Well I feel A is the answer. I guess I'm right. If some expert could throw
Join the discussion

by Eric77Gorm » Sun May 15, 2016 11:50 pm
Well I feel B is the answer.
Join the discussion